2005
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of expression of the early growth response gene-1 (EGR-1) in malignant and benign cells of the prostate

Abstract: PC-3 cells maintain a long lasting, heavily phosphorylated pool of EGR-1, which binds poorly to DNA and responds poorly to mitogenic stimulus. BPH-1 cells, in contrast, maintain a more responsive, less phosphorylated EGR-1 pool. These findings suggest that EGR-1 expression and activity is differentially regulated in PC-3 and BPH-1 cell lines.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
27
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, four conjugates of QD-antibodies were used to recognize and detect the four antigens which are responsible for causing tumor (the tumor-suppressor p53, the E3 ubiquitin ligase mdm-2, the zincfinger transcription factor EGR-1 and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21/CDN1A). These markers were known to vital in diagnosis of prostate cancer and they have also been correlated with the behavior of tumor [79,80]. In case of molecular profiling, the results of QDs were consistent with results obtained by the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) and using human breast cancer cells [19].…”
Section: Impact Of Nanotechnology In Clinical Validation By Multipledsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In this study, four conjugates of QD-antibodies were used to recognize and detect the four antigens which are responsible for causing tumor (the tumor-suppressor p53, the E3 ubiquitin ligase mdm-2, the zincfinger transcription factor EGR-1 and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21/CDN1A). These markers were known to vital in diagnosis of prostate cancer and they have also been correlated with the behavior of tumor [79,80]. In case of molecular profiling, the results of QDs were consistent with results obtained by the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) and using human breast cancer cells [19].…”
Section: Impact Of Nanotechnology In Clinical Validation By Multipledsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For molecular profiling of clinical FFPE prostate specimens, we have also obtained interesting results by using four tumor antigens (mdm-2, p53, EGR-1 and p21), as shown in Figure 8. These markers are known to be important in prostate cancer diagnosis and are correlated with tumor behavior 39,40 . We are able to detect all four markers in the tissue specimens, but the autofluorescence is higher than that observed in FFPE cells.…”
Section: Box 2 | Size Tunable Vs Composition Tunable Qdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 11 highest upregulated transcripts in TAHN tissues were EGR-1, c-Fos, and the growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), also called macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC1). EGR-1 has been strongly implicated in prostate cancer (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and regulates multiple target genes that in turn have a potential role in prostatic carcinogenesis and progression, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), thereby regulating a spectrum of cellular responses, including growth and growth arrest, survival and apoptosis, and differentiation and transformation (40,41). The involvement of c-Fos as part of the transcription factor activator protein 1 (AP-1) that is activated downstream of many growth factors is supported by a large body of literature on oncogenesis and metastasis (42,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…~2.8-fold up-regulated compared to cancer-free tissues, as defined in Table III). Early growth response protein 1 (EGR-1) represents the transcript most up-regulated (8.92-fold) in TAHN tissues and has been previously implicated in prostate tumorigenesis (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Its expression in tumor tissue was 9.27-fold (Table IV).…”
Section: Microarray Expression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%