2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijcm.2019.100856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of enterprise risk management: a comparative analysis of Australia, Germany and the USA

Abstract: Enterprise risk management (ERM) has become a ubiquitous strategy, especially among international corporate governance regulations. This paper aims to examine the level of risk management regulation through an international comparison approach. Specifically, from a corporate governance perspective, we investigate the Australian risk management regulations and compare it to the regulations of the USA and Germany. We find clear differences in each country's approach, with the USA having the highest level of regu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, in the rapidly changing environment, the need for organizational innovation capability is further enhanced (Bysted 2013;Kurz et al 2018). Bledow et al (2019) argued that innovation is not an unrestrained and vigorous speculation but requires a divergent mind and the ability to restrain and adopt new methods, as well as constantly proposing critical ideas in the two stages. Within the organization, employees' innovative behavior must require them to consider outside the existing framework (Bysted 2013;Chin and Rasdi 2014;De Vos et al 2011), but it also implies that employees must have the courage to identify defects and problems and be willing to provide suggestions (Akgunduz et al 2018;Kurz et al 2018) in order to promote and improve employees' innovative behavior (George and Zhou 2007).…”
Section: Relationship Between Knowledge Transfer and Innovative Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, in the rapidly changing environment, the need for organizational innovation capability is further enhanced (Bysted 2013;Kurz et al 2018). Bledow et al (2019) argued that innovation is not an unrestrained and vigorous speculation but requires a divergent mind and the ability to restrain and adopt new methods, as well as constantly proposing critical ideas in the two stages. Within the organization, employees' innovative behavior must require them to consider outside the existing framework (Bysted 2013;Chin and Rasdi 2014;De Vos et al 2011), but it also implies that employees must have the courage to identify defects and problems and be willing to provide suggestions (Akgunduz et al 2018;Kurz et al 2018) in order to promote and improve employees' innovative behavior (George and Zhou 2007).…”
Section: Relationship Between Knowledge Transfer and Innovative Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inspired several publications on corporate governance reforms and legislations all over the world. They encouraged firms to move beyond the financial risks sphere and adopt a broader range of risks (Bledow et al, 2019). By the early 2000s, the notion of a "holistic" risk management framework took a more concrete shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Companies in various countries and fields of activity focus this aspect of risk management on research. For example, Chinese construction firms in Singapore [3], Croatian Companies [4], Malaysian companies [5], petrochemical industry companies [6], French firms [7], Australia, Germany and the USA companies [8], Spanish companies [9].…”
Section: Introduce the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%