2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of emotions, interpersonal conflict, and job performance for salespeople

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
89
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant relationship was found between felt stress and job performance, despite evidence from a prior study of such a relationship (Mulki et al, 2015). This may be due to the hypothesized effect of moderate levels of stress stimulating employees 'to excel' (Singh, 1998, p. 71).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…No significant relationship was found between felt stress and job performance, despite evidence from a prior study of such a relationship (Mulki et al, 2015). This may be due to the hypothesized effect of moderate levels of stress stimulating employees 'to excel' (Singh, 1998, p. 71).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While emotional intelligence is related to the recognition and controlling of own and others' emotions it may play a significant role in lowering interpersonal conflict, as emotional intelligent employees are able to regulate their emotions and use their ability to reduce conflict and maybe even solve conflict (Mulki, Jaramillo, Goad, & Pesquera, 2015). Schutte, Malouff, Simunek, McKenley, and Hollander (2002) show that emotional intelligent individuals are better able to handle threats to their positive attitude in negative situations, which can also be of significant importance in work related conflict situations.…”
Section: Emotional Intelligence and Conflict Handling Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, it seems likely that surface acting would mediate the negative relationships between conflict and performance, through the reduction of negative workplace relationships as well as emotional contagion, or the tendency for an individual to mimic the emotions displayed by another individual (Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1994). Initial evidence indicates that emotion regulation in response to conflicts improves performance (Mulki, Jaramillo, Goad, & Pesquera, 2015). Therefore, we propose that task, relationship and non-task organizational conflict will be related to strain outcomes and performance indirectly through surface acting.…”
Section: Interpersonal Conflict and Emotional Labourmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Accordingly, it seems likely that surface acting would mediate the negative relationships between conflict and performance, through the reduction of negative workplace relationships as well as emotional contagion, or the tendency for an individual to mimic the emotions displayed by another individual (Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, ). Initial evidence indicates that emotion regulation in response to conflicts improves performance (Mulki, Jaramillo, Goad, & Pesquera, ). Therefore, we propose that task, relationship and non‐task organizational conflict will be related to strain outcomes and performance indirectly through surface acting.Hypothesis Task conflict will have positive indirect effects on depressive symptoms, physical symptoms and performance through surface acting.Hypothesis Relationship conflict will have positive indirect effects on depressive symptoms, physical symptoms and performance through surface acting.Hypothesis Non‐task organizational conflict will have positive indirect effects on depressive symptoms, physical symptoms and performance through surface acting.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%