1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1995.tb01010.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of egg production, worm burden, worm length and worm fecundity by host responses in sheep infected with Ostertagia circumcincta

Abstract: Following infection with Ostertagia circumcincta there was considerable variation in worm burdens, worm size and number of inhibited larvae even among sheep matched for age, sex, breed, farm of origin and history of parasite exposure. There was also substantial variation among sheep in the concentration of mast cells, globule leucocytes, eosinophils, IgA-positive plasma cells and parasite-specific IgA in the abomasal mucosa. With the exception of faecal egg counts over time, the parasitological and immunologic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
213
6
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(9 reference statements)
12
213
6
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Among phenotypic parameters, FEC is the most reliable, practical and frequently used indicator to assess the host resistance/tolerance potential against GINs in natural infection (Gray, 1991;Woolaston, 1992;Kemper et al, 2009). In lambs, it is well documented that FEC is highly correlated with worm counts (McKenna, 1981;Eady, 1995;Stear et al, 1995;Douch et al, 1996;Woolaston and Baker, 1996;Good et al, 2006), particularly when infections are of Haemonchus (H.) contortus and Trichostrongylus (T.) colubriformis. Selection based on low FEC has satisfactory upshots as GINs will not adapt quickly to sheep bred for nematode resistance (Kemper et al, 2009).…”
Section: Fecmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Among phenotypic parameters, FEC is the most reliable, practical and frequently used indicator to assess the host resistance/tolerance potential against GINs in natural infection (Gray, 1991;Woolaston, 1992;Kemper et al, 2009). In lambs, it is well documented that FEC is highly correlated with worm counts (McKenna, 1981;Eady, 1995;Stear et al, 1995;Douch et al, 1996;Woolaston and Baker, 1996;Good et al, 2006), particularly when infections are of Haemonchus (H.) contortus and Trichostrongylus (T.) colubriformis. Selection based on low FEC has satisfactory upshots as GINs will not adapt quickly to sheep bred for nematode resistance (Kemper et al, 2009).…”
Section: Fecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lambs have a capability to control worm length but not worm number. Resistance to H. contortus has been linked to the lengthening of prepatent periods, lower FEC, lower parasite establishment rate, lower adult worm burden and increase in larval inhibition in the abomasal mucosa (Altaif and Dargie, 1978;Stear et al, 1995). found a curvilinear relation between worm length and fecundity in Tel.…”
Section: Fecmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The worm burdens at slaughter and pattern of total daily egg excretion (Figure 2), however, confirmed that the ability to limit worm population and its fecundity was indeed compromised by corticosteroid treatment. In view of the putative role of IgA in the regulation and expulsion of nematodes (Stear et al, 1995) and the negative relationship between rise in serum IgA and VFI observed by Greer et al (2005b), the serum IgA responses of these sheep were Table 3 Mean and standard deviation (s.d.) of the absorbance (optical density (OD)) of IgA specific to L3 T. colubriformis antigen in serum collected from lambs during day 49 to day 77 of infection with 2000 L3 T. colubriformis larvae/day and mean worm burden for animals offered high protein (H) and low protein (L) diets according to initial immuno-suppressed (ISIF) or non-suppressed (IF) treatments and re-classified groups termed L3 IgA responders (R) and non-responders (N) (changes in liveweight gain, carcass composition estimated by computed tomography and the effect on gross efficiency of metabolizable energy (ME) utilization for net energy (NE) deposition for the reclassified groups are also given -) Protein influences ME utilization in parasitized lambs carefully examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%