2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of CRISPR–Cas adaptive immune systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of this mechanism is possibly because this strategy would be unable to interfere with CRISPR nucleases that were assembled prior to infection. Nonetheless, many CRISPR systems are tightly regulated and are often activated in response to cell density and other factors (Høyland-Kroghsbo et al, 2016; Patterson et al, 2016, 2017). Inhibition of crRNA binding could be an effective Acr method to inhibit those systems where RNP assembly coincides with phage infection, and such inhibitors may yet be discovered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of this mechanism is possibly because this strategy would be unable to interfere with CRISPR nucleases that were assembled prior to infection. Nonetheless, many CRISPR systems are tightly regulated and are often activated in response to cell density and other factors (Høyland-Kroghsbo et al, 2016; Patterson et al, 2016, 2017). Inhibition of crRNA binding could be an effective Acr method to inhibit those systems where RNP assembly coincides with phage infection, and such inhibitors may yet be discovered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results provide the first example of an intrinsic CRISPR-Cas regulator within a bacterial host. The emerging literature on CRISPR-Cas regulation in bacteria focuses on transcription factors or chaperones encoded in the genomes of hosts with type I CRISPRsystems 20 . In these cases, CRISPR-Cas promoters likely evolved to join existing regulons, enabling CRISPR activities to be tied to a variety of internal and environmental stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How are CRISPR systems regulated within their bacterial hosts to prevent autoimmunity and enhance targeting of foreign agents? Several studies have demonstrated transcriptional and post-transcriptional CRISPR-Cas regulation in response to extracellular and intracellular cues 20 , including phage infection [21][22][23][24][25] , quorum sensing 26,27 , membrane stress [28][29][30][31] , metabolic status 21,32,33 and surface association 34 . In many cases where the regulatory mechanisms are known, host-encoded transcription factors interact with CRISPR-Cas promoters 32,33,35,36 , although several studies have shown that archaeal type I-A systems can be intrinsically controlled by dedicated Cas-encoded transcription factors 25,[37][38][39][40] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversity of CRISPR-Cas systems is mirrored in emerging knowledge of networks for transcriptional regulation of CRISPR-Cas systems in different organisms, reviewed recently [54]. H-NS is a consistent performer across species for regulating CRISPR-Cas systems, acting as a transcriptional repressor, but there are many more unique or specialized effects of other transcriptional regulators.…”
Section: Examples Of Non-cas Host Proteins In Crispr-cas Immunitymentioning
confidence: 99%