2007
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.11340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of CD38 in proliferating chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells stimulated with CD154 and interleukin-4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CD40L-expressing fibroblast stromal cell system has made it possible to isolate the epigenetic changes that occur in CLL upon treatment with such inhibitors (36)(37)(38). Furthermore, this being the first murine-based feeder cell system provides an obvious advantage when using PCR specific for a rare-expressed human gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CD40L-expressing fibroblast stromal cell system has made it possible to isolate the epigenetic changes that occur in CLL upon treatment with such inhibitors (36)(37)(38). Furthermore, this being the first murine-based feeder cell system provides an obvious advantage when using PCR specific for a rare-expressed human gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46][47] Venetoclax (10 nM) induced cytotoxicity was significantly decreased in both coculture systems, with an average cell kill of 8% (n 5 6) for CD40L-cocultured cells and 30% (n 5 4) for OP9-cocultured cells compared with 60% kill in unstimulated (suspension) CLL cells (n 5 6) ( Figure 5A, bottom left panel and B; supplemental Figure 4A). In unstimulated cells, the high total kill (.95%) measured for the drug combination can be attributed to the single-agent effect of venetoclax (supplemental Figure 4A, bottom panel).…”
Section: -41mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,56 Therefore, it is a "real-time" indicator of the level of leukemic proliferation and thereby actual or potential clonal evolution, which ultimately determines the clinical course and outcome for an individual patient. This evolutionary change can be affected by many parameters 84 ; in particular, it can be influenced by stimulation through cell surface receptors for antigens, 83 cytokines, chemokines, 19,74,82 etc, within the microenvironment. Simplistically viewed, the more CD38 ϩ cells in a clone, the greater the number of dividing cells and hence the greater the chance for occurrence of new DNA lesions, enhanced clonal aggressiveness, and worse clinical outcome.…”
Section: Pros and Cons In Using Cd38 As A Marker And A Therapeutic Tamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Besides being variable among CLL patients, CD38 expression can change at anatomic sites, being higher in BM and in areas of intense CLL/T lymphocyte contact. 19 Accordingly, during CLL cell activation in vitro, CD38 expression can be up-regulated by a number of different signals, such as IL-2, 74 CD40L plus IL-4, 82 CpG oligonucleotides, 83 and coculture with mesenchymal stem cells. 84 A single nucleotide polymorphism (C Ͼ G, rs6449182) is located at the 5Ј end of intron 1 of CD38, 81 and allelic frequencies of the polymorphism in healthy Italian, Spanish, Irish, and Polish populations have been defined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%