2007
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[1134:rocpbm]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of carbon processes by macrophyte species in a Great Lakes coastal wetland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
25
3
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
25
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, much of our knowledge of plant decay processes in freshwater marshes comes from traditional litter bag studies that were conducted at or within the marsh sediments or overlying surface waters (Polunin 1984;Rothman and Bouchard 2007;Fennessy et al 2008). Furthermore, many of these studies examined decay patterns using plant material that had been prematurely harvested (living green or recently senesced) manipulated (e.g., oven-dried), or both-a widespread practice that continues even today (Rothman and Bouchard 2007;Fennessy et al 2008). These methodological approaches eliminate, either partially or completely, the initial standing decay phase and often lead to serious artifacts (e.g., altered Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, much of our knowledge of plant decay processes in freshwater marshes comes from traditional litter bag studies that were conducted at or within the marsh sediments or overlying surface waters (Polunin 1984;Rothman and Bouchard 2007;Fennessy et al 2008). Furthermore, many of these studies examined decay patterns using plant material that had been prematurely harvested (living green or recently senesced) manipulated (e.g., oven-dried), or both-a widespread practice that continues even today (Rothman and Bouchard 2007;Fennessy et al 2008). These methodological approaches eliminate, either partially or completely, the initial standing decay phase and often lead to serious artifacts (e.g., altered Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, studies have focused on the processes that influence soil C accumulation (Connor et al 2001;Chmura et al 2003;Craft 2007) and species effects on soil carbon storage (Rothman and Bouchard 2007;Mahaney et al 2008) and marsh accretion (Rooth et al 2003). Primary production (Blum 1993) and decomposition (Craft 2007;Rothman and Bouchard 2007) have both been suggested to be the predominant biotic process regulating soil carbon content and accumulation. There is significant spatial variability in soil C accumulation in wetlands, which has been associated with differences in sediment deposition rate (Khan and Brush 1994;Chmura et al 2003), but the nature of C burial is not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite similarities between Typha spp. and Phragmites australis biomass composition, Rothman and Bouchard (2007) observed differences in C utilization patterns in wetland soils invaded by these two plant species. Marchante et al (2008) attributed alterations in soil microbial diversity following Acacia longifolia invasion to deposition of N-rich litter by the invading legume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The impact of such shifts in vegetation composition on soil functions is an ecological issue that has been the focus Rothman and Bouchard 2007;Marchante et al 2008), but important questions remain with respect to processlevel understanding of the factors associated with soil responses to plant invasion. Such responses include alteration of the soil microbial community which in turn could affect important soil processes such as litter decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation