2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00062.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of cancer cell motility through actin reorganization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
475
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 544 publications
(500 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
10
475
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between control and MCF-7/AZ.Pcad cells were evident as P-cadherin-overexpressing cells showed an increase in membrane ruffling and in actin cellular extensions, as well as in their cytoplasmic area ( Figure 5). Indeed, P-cadherinoverexpressing cells, including MCF-7/AZ.Pcad and BT-20, show an upper cell localized nuclei and appear as rounded and flat cells with actin-rich sheet-like membrane protrusive structures that, according with the literature, are essentially observed during crawling cell motility and spreading (Yamazaki et al, 2005;Chhabra and Higgs, 2007). Using double F-actin and p120ctn staining, MCF-7/AZ.Mock versus MCF-7/AZ.Pcad cells showed distinct aggregation ability, where MCF-7/AZ.Mock cells, in contrast to P-cadherin-overexpressing cells, showed well-formed and tight aggregates ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Soluble P-cadherin Induces Breast Cancer Cell Invasionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences between control and MCF-7/AZ.Pcad cells were evident as P-cadherin-overexpressing cells showed an increase in membrane ruffling and in actin cellular extensions, as well as in their cytoplasmic area ( Figure 5). Indeed, P-cadherinoverexpressing cells, including MCF-7/AZ.Pcad and BT-20, show an upper cell localized nuclei and appear as rounded and flat cells with actin-rich sheet-like membrane protrusive structures that, according with the literature, are essentially observed during crawling cell motility and spreading (Yamazaki et al, 2005;Chhabra and Higgs, 2007). Using double F-actin and p120ctn staining, MCF-7/AZ.Mock versus MCF-7/AZ.Pcad cells showed distinct aggregation ability, where MCF-7/AZ.Mock cells, in contrast to P-cadherin-overexpressing cells, showed well-formed and tight aggregates ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Soluble P-cadherin Induces Breast Cancer Cell Invasionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Indeed, microscopic fluorescence imaging of P-cadherin expressing cells showed that P-cadherin destabilizes cell-cell adhesion, promoting cytoskeleton changes, leading to a different cell phenotype. The cells resemble the aggressive morphology observed in primary basallike P-cadherin-positive breast carcinomas, as these cells normally acquire a large cytoplasm and several membrane protrusions, and cell-cell adhesion is not usually mediated by a compact zipper-like structure (Yamazaki et al, 2005;Chhabra and Higgs, 2007).…”
Section: Soluble P-cadherin Induces Breast Cancer Cell Invasionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, it is possible that not only integrin β1, but also MT1-MMP is activated by irradiation, resulting in increased migration of IR cells. Furthermore, the formation of membrane protrusions at the leading edge of migrating cells, as a result of actin reorganization, is regulated by one of the small GTPases, Rac [12], and activated Rac1 induces integrin-dependent migration in mammary epithelial cells [13]. Therefore, Rac activity might be necessary to induce invasiveness in IR cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell migration is a critical step for metastasis, and thus control of cell migration via the actin cytoskeleton provides the possibility for regulation of metastasis [38]. We identified 9 up-regulated and 19 downregulated genes with cytoskeleton-related functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%