2008
DOI: 10.3103/s0891416808040010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of biofilm formation in Escherichia coli K12: Effect of mutations in the genes HNS, STRA, LON, and RPON

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of 54 in regulating numerous biological properties, including those related to virulence, has been well documented for a variety of bacterial species (3,10,21,42,49,51,52,55,58,59). However, its role in E. faecalis has been limited to observations made regarding its contribution to sensitivity to class IIa bacteriocins through the regulation of sugar PTSs (9,13,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The role of 54 in regulating numerous biological properties, including those related to virulence, has been well documented for a variety of bacterial species (3,10,21,42,49,51,52,55,58,59). However, its role in E. faecalis has been limited to observations made regarding its contribution to sensitivity to class IIa bacteriocins through the regulation of sugar PTSs (9,13,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the major food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, 54 is essential for its osmotolerance potential (41) and is responsible for mesentericin sensitivity (14, 41), whereas in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 54 influences the activity of isocitrate lyase (21), alginate biosynthesis (6), and pilin and flagellin production, in addition to several other virulence determinants (44). Sigma 54 also regulates biofilm formation, enterocyte effacement, acid tolerance, flagellar biosynthesis, and several other processes in Escherichia coli (3,49,60).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in earlier studies, it was reported that mutant strains of RpoN in E. coli K12 and Enterococcus faecalis also formed biofilms [57, 58]. RpoS mutant strain was also observed to form biofilm in E. coli ZK126 stains as well as in P. aeroginosa [59, 60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RpoN mutant strain of B. burgdorferi formed a biofilm which was 22% less in size than the wild-type 297. Previously, it was reported that the deletion of RpoN gene in E. coli K12 strains increased the biofilm formation by 40–60%, and also in E. faecalis , the RpoN mutant strain was observed to form robust biofilms [57, 58]. In this study, we showed that RpoS mutant strain of B. burgdorferi had 16% reduction in the biofilm formation compared to wild-type similar to the deletion of RpoS gene in E. coli ZK126 which reduced the biofilm size by 50% [59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is required by Burkholderia cenocepacia to form biofilm and to survive inside macrophage [61]. On the other hand, in E. coli s54 regulates biofilm formation and flagelar synthesis amongst other processes [62,63]. Also, s54 regulates initial attachment of Enterococcus faecalis to its substrate and the composition of the biofilm matrix [64].…”
Section: Signal Transduction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 97%