2004
DOI: 10.1177/1073858404264680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Arm and Leg Movement during Human Locomotion

Abstract: Walking can be a very automated process, and it is likely that central pattern generators (CPGs) play a role in the coordination of the limbs. Recent evidence suggests that both the arms and legs are regulated by CPGs and that sensory feedback also regulates the CPG activity and assists in mediating interlimb coordination. Although the strength of coupling between the legs is stronger than that between the arms, arm and leg movements are similarly regulated by CPG activity and sensory feedback (e.g., reflex co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
256
2
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
15
256
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A third possibility is that the two aspects of the task, namely the locomotion and the voluntary movement, would each have their own temporal activation components that are superimposed in the combined task, as envisioned by the motor primitives proposal. This result could be expected if the characteristic activation timing for locomotion were generated separately from any voluntary activation timing, although a coupling of corticospinal with cervical and thoraco-lumbar propriospinal circuits (Dietz, 2002;Zehr and Duysens, 2004) may result in partial synchronization of activation components. Additional temporal components would imply voluntary activation timings that are not represented in the locomotion sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A third possibility is that the two aspects of the task, namely the locomotion and the voluntary movement, would each have their own temporal activation components that are superimposed in the combined task, as envisioned by the motor primitives proposal. This result could be expected if the characteristic activation timing for locomotion were generated separately from any voluntary activation timing, although a coupling of corticospinal with cervical and thoraco-lumbar propriospinal circuits (Dietz, 2002;Zehr and Duysens, 2004) may result in partial synchronization of activation components. Additional temporal components would imply voluntary activation timings that are not represented in the locomotion sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Centrally located neuronal circuits, known as central pattern generators (CPG), can generate the basic motor pattern for locomotion even without afferent feedback from peripheral receptors 21) . These descending commands of the central nervous system delegate the motor commands for rhythmic movement of the CPG network in the spinal cord 23,24) . However, it is likely that the spinal networks that contribute to human locomotion are more dependent on supraspinal centers than those in quadrupedal animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This neural network can be found in the spinal cord of all vertebrates, like the lamprey [66] and mammals [48] including humans [49,67,68]. The locomotor CPG may produce coordinated motor patterns in isolation.…”
Section: The Locomotor Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%