2003
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of a renal urea transporter with reduced salinity in a marine elasmobranch,Raja erinacea

Abstract: SUMMARYMarine elasmobranchs retain urea and other osmolytes, e.g. trimethylamine oxide (TMAO), to counterbalance the osmotic pressure of seawater. We investigated whether a renal urea transporter(s) would be regulated in response to dilution of the external environment. A 779 bp cDNA for a putative skate kidney urea transporter (SkUT) was cloned, sequenced and found to display relatively high identity with facilitated urea transporters from other vertebrates. Northern analysis using SkUT as a probe revealed th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that the expression of only one of the strUT-2 transcripts was lower after exposure to low salinity contrasts to the finding that the expression of all three transcripts homologous to a skate urea transporter were lower in the kidneys of little skates exposed to 50% seawater compared with those in 100% seawater (24). Interestingly, renal urea transporter expression was not different between spiny dogfish sharks exposed to 75% seawater or maintained in 100% seawater (27).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our finding that the expression of only one of the strUT-2 transcripts was lower after exposure to low salinity contrasts to the finding that the expression of all three transcripts homologous to a skate urea transporter were lower in the kidneys of little skates exposed to 50% seawater compared with those in 100% seawater (24). Interestingly, renal urea transporter expression was not different between spiny dogfish sharks exposed to 75% seawater or maintained in 100% seawater (27).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Although, this increase in the filtered load is to a large extent balanced by increased tubular reabsorption, fractional reabsorption of urea is lower in elasmobranchs exposed to low salinity (66 -84%). The finding that kidney urea transporter RNA abundance was lower in marginally euryhaline skates, Raja erinacea exposed to low salinity for 5 days than that in the kidneys of skates at high salinity, has led to the proposal that decreased expression of facilitated urea transporter gene expression contributes at least in part, to the decrease in fractional urea reabsorption (24). We have previously observed that the euryhaline, Atlantic stingrays exposed to a 50% reduction in salinity for 24 h have lower fractional urea reabsorption (84%) compared with rays maintained at high salinity (96%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These fish appear to be nitrogen limited (Haywood, 1973;Wood et al, 2005;Kajimura et al, 2006;Kajimura et al, 2008), exhibiting elaborate urea-retention mechanisms at the gills (Boylan, 1967;Pärt et al, 1998;Fines et al, 2001;Wood et al, 2013a) and kidney (Schmidt-Nielsen et al, 1972;Morgan et al, 2003a;Morgan et al, 2003b). Nevertheless, there is still substantial urea leakage across the gills, so elasmobranchs are predominantly ureotelic, excreting very little ammonia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active urea transport processes have been described in a variety of tissues, which include: (1) Na + -linked active urea transport in the renal tubule (Schmidt-Nielsen et al, 1972;Morgan et al, 2003a;Morgan et al, 2003b) and gills (Fines et al, 2001) of the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias; (2) phloretin-inhibitable active urea secretion in rabbit proximal straight tubules (Kawamura and Kokko, 1976); (3) H + -dependent and/or phloretin-inhibitable active urea transport in the skins of Bufo bufo, Bufo marinus, Bufo viridis and Rana esculenta (Ussing and Johansen, 1969;GarciaRomeu et al, 1981;Rapoport et al, 1988;Lacoste et al, 1991;Dytko et al, 1993); (4) active urea transport in kidney tubules from dogs (Goldberg et al, 1967;Beyer and Gelarden, 1988) and frogs (Forster, 1954;Schmidt-Nielsen and Shrauger, 1963); (5) active urea transport in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Pateman et al, 1982;ElBerry et al, 1993); and (6) active urea transport in bacteria (Jahns et al, 1988). However, to date, molecular characterizations of these active UTs have not been performed and therefore a molecular understanding of these transporters in comparison of UT-A, UT-B and UT-C is not possible at present.…”
Section: The Buccopharyngeal Epithelium Is Capable Of Active Urea Excmentioning
confidence: 99%