Regulation in the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic times: day-watchman tackling the novel coronavirus

Abstract

Purpose While fighting with the novel coronavirus will not be the main goal of sectoral regulators, different regulatory authorities join the struggle by providing a regulatory response. The purpose of this paper is to address this regulatory response in pandemic gathered around eight thematic areas. Design/methodology/approach This paper discusses the regulatory response in pandemic gathered around eight thematic areas, namely, the objectives, rules and standards, authorization and permits, procedure, monitoring and surveillance, enforcement, accountability and an institution presenting regulatory actions to tackle coronavirus (COVID-19) in reference to day-watchman type regulation. Findings Tackling the COVID-19 pandemic should be a knowledge-based approach (taking as much as possible from best available practices with respect to the novel coronavirus) with a framework of rules, standards, authorization, permits and guidance, monitored and enforced in a way adjusted to conditions of the pandemic, being as safe (as non-physical, as online) as possible, with suspended or extended deadlines, free of unnecessary administrative burdens. In this way, regulation should be pragmatic and flexible, as under the day-watchman model. Research limitations/implications In a post-pandemic regime, in the short run, the regulators should try to minimize the social and economic challenges faced by consumers and entrepreneurs. Among them, one may find scaling back, at least temporarily, the rules developed in non-disaster contexts. However, in the end, the post-disaster reforms tended to strengthen regulators’ hands, also under the deregulated government. The day-watchman type regulation balances both, as a middle ground approach, being a bridge between “a total subordination” and “a complete release.” Practical implications The disaster management (including public law regulation) provided by public authorities when tackling the effects of hurricanes, earthquakes or tsunamis can be a benchmark for regulatory responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. This concerns the support offered to entities and individuals affected by the negative consequences of reducing or stopping their businesses and staying in isolation. Social implications The day-watchman approach, visible in certain examples of public response to COVID-19 may serve as a framework for establishing a regulatory regime that would automatically take effect in case of another pandemic, limiting delays in regulatory actions, reducing non-compliance and accelerating recovery. Originality/value This study provides an analysis of different theories on public regulation addressing the notion of regulation using the day-watchman theory, which could be applied in regulatory actions during a pandemic. The paper discusses concrete steps taken by regulatory authorities worldwide, bringing examples from the USA, Canada, the UK, France, China, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. It juxtaposes the regulatory experiences derived from different catastrophes such as hurricanes, earthquakes or tsunamis with the regulatory response in a pandemic.

Artificial intelligence and information management in the energy transition of India: lessons from the global IT heart

“…India has a long history of creating policy structures to counter new technological advances. As the growth of the IT industry has shown, a strict regulatory approach hampered the potential for improving India’s economy’s innovativeness, while a more flexible approach, with active state involvement (like a day-watchman type), was beneficial (Sokołowski, 2020a, 2020b). It is a valuable lesson from the global IT heart of the GS, which is India.…”

How Pandemic Films Help Us Understand Outbreaks: Implications for Futures and Foresight

“…First, the coverage of pandemics is limited in existing films. The crash of financial markets, the closedown of many businesses, the surge of unemployment, travel bans, flight suspensions, food shortages (Baldwin and Mauro 2020), changed international conflict patterns (Bloem and Salemi 2021), regulations, and legal controversies on the pandemic control (Sokołowski 2020), as well as both positive and negative environmental impacts of the pandemics (Rume and Islam 2020), which we have witnessed in the current COVID-19 pandemic, are not well depicted in existing films. In comparison to the often-used frameworks in foresight such as the PESTEL analysis (Yüksel 2012), healthcare activation, political activation, and the public awareness activation in our procedural model correspond to technological, political, and social factors in the PESTEL, respectively.…”

Praktik Pengendalian Internal pada Pengelolaan Keuangan di Lembaga Kemahasiswaan

“…Pertama, mengisi kesenjangan dalam literatur tentang pengendalian internal di masa pandemi covid 19 yang selama ini yang belum tereksplorasi. Studi sebelumnya, berkaitan dengan implikasi wabah pandemi covid 19 masih terbatas pada tinjauan literatur (Sokołowski, 2020;Regus, 2021) dan lebih fokus pada kinerja pasar (Liu et.al, 2020;Xu, 2020). Kedua, mengambil objek pada lembaga kemahasiswaan yang masih jarang dieksplorasi.…”