2012
DOI: 10.1504/aajfa.2012.046334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation and risk taking in the banking industry: evidence from Tunisia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the results show the regulatory capital effects on the bank risk taking in the egyptian banks, this result enhanced the second hypothesis, which refers to that increase regualtory capital higher risk taking, which banks engage in more risky activities or encounter any problems. This results consist of many studies like : (Linsmeier, 2011;Francis & Osborne, 2012;Ayaydin & Karakaya , 2014;and Abou-El-Sood, 2016) but this result isnot consistent with a large number of studies claim that there is a statistical significance negative relationship between regualtory capital and bank risk taking (Belanes & Hajiba, 2012;Shim, 2013;and Chiaramonte & Casu, 2016). Capital is not the only reason behind banking fragility but improving the quantity and quality of capital can lead to improving the performance of banks, and this supports the results have proved that banks use cheapest types of capital in order to meet the regulatory standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the results show the regulatory capital effects on the bank risk taking in the egyptian banks, this result enhanced the second hypothesis, which refers to that increase regualtory capital higher risk taking, which banks engage in more risky activities or encounter any problems. This results consist of many studies like : (Linsmeier, 2011;Francis & Osborne, 2012;Ayaydin & Karakaya , 2014;and Abou-El-Sood, 2016) but this result isnot consistent with a large number of studies claim that there is a statistical significance negative relationship between regualtory capital and bank risk taking (Belanes & Hajiba, 2012;Shim, 2013;and Chiaramonte & Casu, 2016). Capital is not the only reason behind banking fragility but improving the quantity and quality of capital can lead to improving the performance of banks, and this supports the results have proved that banks use cheapest types of capital in order to meet the regulatory standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…To examine the association between applying international capital requirements and bank risk, Belanes and Hajiba (2012) have shown how the application of international standards of capital requirements in 1999 in Tunisian banks helped them in reducing the default risk which has resulted in banking stability. They also have added that large banks engage in more risk as driven by market.…”
Section: Regulatory Capital and Bank Risk Takingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, the findings reveal that a larger regulatory capital base is a defensive tool against a bank's default since it covers credit, market, and operational losses (e.g. Belanes and Hajiba, 2012;Berger and Bouwman, 2013;Lee and Hsieh, 2013;Nguyen, 2013;Adesina and Mwamba, 2016;Fratzscher et al, 2016;Laeven et al, 2016).…”
Section: Regulatory Capital and Bank Risk-takingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 These capital regulations absorb banks' losses and enable banks to withstand economic shocks (e.g. Naceur and Kandil, 2009;Belanes and Hajiba, 2012;Adesina and Mwamba, 2016). Nevertheless, some banks that maintained the regulatory capital adequacy ratio collapsed during the financial crisis of 2007(e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%