2005
DOI: 10.1128/jb.187.12.4077-4085.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation and Function of Cytochrome c ′ in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are typically homodimers with each monomer forming a four-α-helix bundle and containing a pentacoordinate (5c) c-type heme with a proximal histidine ligand and a vacant distal coordination site. Although the exact physiological functions of CYTcp remain unclear, previous studies have suggested roles in suppression of toxic levels of NO [3], defence against nitrosoative stress or an NO reductase activity [4], or NO shuttling between nitrite reductase and NO reductase during denitrification [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are typically homodimers with each monomer forming a four-α-helix bundle and containing a pentacoordinate (5c) c-type heme with a proximal histidine ligand and a vacant distal coordination site. Although the exact physiological functions of CYTcp remain unclear, previous studies have suggested roles in suppression of toxic levels of NO [3], defence against nitrosoative stress or an NO reductase activity [4], or NO shuttling between nitrite reductase and NO reductase during denitrification [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wild type RC strain was further shown to produce N 2 O when grown in the presence of NO, leading to the suggestion that RCCP is involved in reductase activity (8). Particularly since NO-reductase activity has not been demonstrated for purified RCCP or any other cytochrome cЈ, it is possible that cytochrome cЈ could be a transporter coupled to a NO reductase, as recently proposed for the species Chromatium vinosum (53) and Rhodobacter sphaeroides (54). In the context of a physiological NO binding role for AXCP, the overall picture is that the distal side controls the initial NO binding, whereas the proximal heme pocket controls the release of NO with the ability of trapping and gating NO despite its close proximity to solvent with a virtually unidirectional release of NO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Steric constraints and electrostatic interaction with the bound ligand on the distal side of the heme group can dramatically influence ligand selectivity (84,90). Different stereochemical strategies appear to have evolved to optimize both absolute ligand affinity and selectivity between NO, CO, and O 2 and to meet specific physiological needs for O 2 storage and transport [e.g., myoglobin (Mb), hemoglobin (Hb) (109)], O 2 sensing (e.g., FixL, EcDos, HemAT) (39), NO storage/transport (nitrophorins) (126), NO sensing (e.g., sGC, cyt c¢, and other sensors of NO) (15,22,26), and CO sensing (e.g., CooA and NPAS in circadian rhythm control) (8,29,95).…”
Section: Effect Of Protein On Heme Ligand Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%