Regulating urban development around major accident hazard pipelines: a systems comparison of governance frameworks in Australia and the UK

Sandri, Orana; Hayes, Jan; Holdsworth, Sarah

doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09785-w

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As urbanization stimulates economic growth [13][14][15], and while natural gas is a cleaner and more efficient substitute to coal [16][17][18], there is the potential to achieve both the economic and environmental goals simultaneously if the government can induce the demand for natural gas by promoting urbanization. However, due to affordability, a shortage of gas supply, hazardous pipelines [19], and concerns about national energy security [20,21], the net effect of urbanization on natural gas demand remains unknown. Thus, the main objective of this study is to evaluate whether China is effective in its promotion of natural gas demand through the promotion of urbanization.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Government-led urbanization and natural gas demand in China

Cai

Zhu

2021

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use:Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes.You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public.If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Government-led urbanization and natural gas demand in China

Cai

Zhu

2021

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The extent to which the outcomes of DRPTN decision models are effective and reliable relies on the quality of attributes integrated into the decision modeling process. Therefore, selecting tenable decision attributes is critical for complex and sensitive problems such as disaster recovery and resilience planning due to the socioeconomic and environmental consequences of decisions (Sandri et al 2020;Beling 2013). However, a gap in conceptual or systematic support for the selection process of DRPTN attributes exists.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A prescriptive framework for recommending decision attributes of infrastructure disaster recovery problems

Zamanifar

Hartmann

2021

Environ Syst Decis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a framework to systematically evaluate and select attributes of decision models used in disaster risk management. In doing so, we formalized the attribute selection process as a sequential screening-utility problem by formulating a prescriptive decision model. The aim is to assist decision-makers in producing a ranked list of attributes and selecting a set among them. We developed an evaluation process consisting of ten criteria in three sequential stages. We used a combination of three decision rules for the evaluation process, alongside mathematically integrated compensatory and non-compensatory techniques as the aggregation methods. We implemented the framework in the context of disaster resilient transportation network to investigate its performance and outcomes. Results show that the framework acted as an inclusive systematic decision aiding mechanism and promoted creative and collaborative decision-making. Preliminary investigations suggest the successful application of the framework in evaluating and selecting a tenable set of attributes. Further analyses are required to discuss the performance of the produced attributes. The properties of the resulting attributes and feedback of the users suggest the quality of outcomes compared to the retrospective attributes that were selected in an unaided selection process. Research and practice can use the framework to conduct a systematic problem-structuring phase of decision analysis and select an equitable set of decision attributes.

show abstract

“…Another important concern related to severe weather and climate change is flood risk management. Sandri et al (2020) describe and compare governance frameworks applied to reducing accident hazards in natural gas pipelines. Proper governance and planning can contribute to the reduction in pipeline accidents and therefore reduce impacts to human lives, environmental degradation, and economic losses.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%