Regulating the sharing economy to prevent the growth of the informal sector in the hospitality industry

Abstract

Purpose To tackle one of the main negative consequences of the sharing economy, namely, the growth of the informal sector, the purpose of this paper is to evaluate for the first time the impacts of the informal sector on the hospitality industry and then to discuss what needs to be done to prevent the further growth of the informal sector in this industry. Design/methodology/approach To evaluate the impacts of the informal sector on the hospitality industry, data are reported from 30 East European and Central Asian countries collected in 2013 in the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey. Findings The finding is that 23 per cent of hotels and restaurants in Eastern Europe and Central Asia report competing against unregistered or informal operators, and 13 per cent view these informal competitors as a major or severe obstacle. The larger the business, the greater is the likelihood that the informal sector is considered their biggest obstacle. Practical implications To prevent the further growth of the informal sector in the hospitality industry, regulation of the sharing economy will be required. To achieve this, it is shown that state authorities need to adopt both direct control measures that alter the costs of operating in the informal sector and the benefits and ease of operating formally, as well as indirect control measures that reduce the acceptability of operating in the informal sector. Originality/value This is the first paper to evaluate the impacts of the informal sector on the hospitality industry and to outline the policy measures required to prevent its further growth with the advent of the sharing economy.

Are Neighbors Friends or Foes? Assessing Airbnb Listings’ Agglomeration Effect in New York City

“…It is not surprising to see research about the home-sharing phenomenon has sparked significant interest among researchers in recent years (Cheng, 2016). Current literature about home-sharing business has covered a wide range of topics, including but not limited to the following: home-sharing business' economic impacts on the lodging market (e.g., Blal et al, 2018;Brochado et al, 2017;Fang et al, 2016;Williams & Horodnic, 2017;Xie & Kwok, 2017;Zervas et al, 2017), effects on the residential rental markets (W. Chen et al, 2019;Horn & Merante, 2017), travelers' experience of home-sharing products (e.g., Guttentag & Smith, 2017;Ju et al, 2019;J. L. Liang et al, 2018;Tussyadiah, 2016;Tussyadiah & Pesonen, 2016, 2018, customers' trust and loyalty attitudes/behaviors toward home-sharing products (e.g., S. Liang et al, 2017;Mao & Lyu, 2017;Xie, Kwok, & Wu, 2019;Xie, Kwok, Wu, & Chen, 2019), the pricing or booking strategies adopted by the hosts (e.g., Chark, 2019;Y.…”

How do sharing organisations create and disrupt institutions? Towards a framework for institutional work in the sharing economy

“…However, claims that consumption patterns pioneered by USOs result in a decrease of industrial production and the related negative human-induced impact on the environment have been questioned (Voytenko Palgan et al., 2017, Plepys and Singh, 2019). Furthermore, some USOs have been criticised by urban citizens, incumbent market actors, city-level policymakers and academia for disrupting product and service markets traditionally ingrained in urban environments, which might also have negative consequences for economic and social sustainability in cities (Katz, 2015, Martin, 2016, Williams and Horodnic, 2017). This disruption of prevailing institutions can be demonstrated with a case from the urban mobility sector: car sharing and ride sharing organisations such as Drivy or Uber are shown to be disrupting private car ownership, but also public transportation systems (Martin and Shaheen, 2011, Meyer and Shaheen, 2017).…”

Humanize your business. The role of personal reputation in the sharing economy

“…Additional socio-economic effects of sharing economy have been identified with regards to new trends in consumer behaviour (Tussyadiah and Pesonen, 2015;Pappas, 2017), behaviours of operators and value co-creation (Camilleri and Neuhofer, 2017;Johnson and Neuhofer, 2017). Furthermore, the spread of these models has created concern about legal issues (Guttentag, 2015;Williams and Horodnic, 2017).…”