1972
DOI: 10.2307/1121459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter adopts a principal–agent framework to explain why autocrats spend money. In the first strand, it has been noted that the need for improving their own career prospects motivates leaders to spend more (Guo, 2009; O'Brien & Li, 1999; Piven & Cloward, 1993). Both democratic and autocratic leaders will spend more in regions where citizens are more aggrieved with their leaders (Benney, 2016; Lee & Zhang, 2013; Stokes, 2005; Zhan, 2021).…”
Section: A Review Of Literature On Fiscal Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter adopts a principal–agent framework to explain why autocrats spend money. In the first strand, it has been noted that the need for improving their own career prospects motivates leaders to spend more (Guo, 2009; O'Brien & Li, 1999; Piven & Cloward, 1993). Both democratic and autocratic leaders will spend more in regions where citizens are more aggrieved with their leaders (Benney, 2016; Lee & Zhang, 2013; Stokes, 2005; Zhan, 2021).…”
Section: A Review Of Literature On Fiscal Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the literature does not explain why this can be the case. Some academics have noted that autocrats, like democratic leaders, are inclined to increase spending to win the hearts of their citizens (Benney, 2016; Guo, 2009; Piven & Cloward, 1993; Zhan, 2021). Their logic is that autocrats are motivated to deal with grievances that will threaten stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deterrence meant that the conditions attached to the receipt of relief would be sufficiently unpleasant to ensure only the genuinely desperate would apply. 'Less eligibility' was the principle that the relief on offer should provide a significantly worse standard of living than even the worst-off 'independent labourer' (Fox-Piven and Cloward, 1972;Polanyi, 2001;Burns, 1941). In the present day this is called a 'work incentive'.…”
Section: The Structure Of State Support In the 1930smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program [SNAP], formerly Food Stamps), public housing, and job-skills training (e.g., Work First programs). Statistical data from Western countries has shown welfare programs have been effective in helping some of the most vulnerable to maintain a basic standard of living (Piven & Cloward, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%