The Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444395433.ch31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating the Internet in the Interests of Children: Emerging European and International Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When it comes to children, the challenge is compounded because no effective way has yet been found to focus regulatory actions just on children – for they are seemingly invisible online. In practice, it seems, platforms must either treat all users (including children) as if they are adults (the current norm) or they must treat everyone as if they were children (a series of failed regulatory efforts testifies to the problems with this approach, the fear being that content regulation that protects children will be used to censor adults; Livingstone 2011). While this regulatory conundrum is taxing many clever minds (most recently resulting in the UK in the promising introduction of a legally-binding Age-Appropriate Design Code by the Information Commissioner’s Office), also worrying are the changing social norms that lead some to shrug their shoulders at a supposedly lost cause – the genie is out of the bottle, they say.…”
Section: Invisible Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to children, the challenge is compounded because no effective way has yet been found to focus regulatory actions just on children – for they are seemingly invisible online. In practice, it seems, platforms must either treat all users (including children) as if they are adults (the current norm) or they must treat everyone as if they were children (a series of failed regulatory efforts testifies to the problems with this approach, the fear being that content regulation that protects children will be used to censor adults; Livingstone 2011). While this regulatory conundrum is taxing many clever minds (most recently resulting in the UK in the promising introduction of a legally-binding Age-Appropriate Design Code by the Information Commissioner’s Office), also worrying are the changing social norms that lead some to shrug their shoulders at a supposedly lost cause – the genie is out of the bottle, they say.…”
Section: Invisible Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other areas, adult and child rights can still be seen to conflict, as sometimes do children's own rights to simultaneously participate and to be protected (Livingstone 2011). Provision that allows for case-by-case consideration according to the specific context is, in such circumstances, especially desirable to meet the needs of particular individuals.…”
Section: Responsibility For Ensuring Children's Rights: Who Are the Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the Internet, it was accepted that democratic nation-states had ‘a responsibility to provide some degree of moral guidance or protection to media users’ (Flew, 2016: 78–79). Furthermore, such states tended to regulate print and film media in accordance with social norms of the time so that formal regulation worked alongside informal social mechanisms to protect children from exposure to adult content (Livingstone, 2011: 14). The arrival of the Internet has raised new challenges to the sovereignty of nation-states in presiding over media standards and regulation (Beattie, 2009; Flew, 2016; Khol, 2012), particularly when it comes to regulating the sale, exhibition and distribution of pornography online.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%