Regulating the computer: comparing policy instruments in Europe and the United States

Abstract

Abstract. The introduction of information technology to governmental agencies has raised considerable concern for the erosion of personal privacy in most advanced democratic states. This article compares and tries to explain the choice of policy instrument in four key countries (Sweden, the United States, West Germany and the United Kingdom) to enforce the protection of personal data. Five options were available from the ‘international repertoire’ of solutions: voluntary control, subject control, licensing, a data commissioner and registration. The Swedes opted for licensing, the Americans rely on subject control, the Germans established a data commissioner and the British chose a registration scheme. In no state, however, were these decisions made from a synoptic analysis of all possible options. Nor did a process of policy diffusion occur. Rather, a combination of domestic constraints seemed to filter out unacceptable options and produce a bias in favour of the resulting policy instrument. In the United States and Sweden, this bias resulted from perceived constitutional imperatives; in West Germany and Britain, the position and power of the respective national bureaucracies produced stiff resistance, a conflictual policy process and resulting policy instruments with few, if any, precedents in their respective systems.

What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?

“…The analysis of the data protection case, for instance, demonstrated a startling convergence of content (statutory principles) yet a divergence on the instruments chosen to enforce them. 61 Policy convergence should also be conceptualized in dynamic terms. The relevant theoretical dimension is time rather than space.…”

Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross–National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability

“…Common codes of "fair information practice" regulating the collection, storage, processing and disclosure of personal data appear in each of these laws (Bennett 1988a;. There are differences relating to the instruments of enforcement (Bennett 1988b), to the precise exemptions, to the type of information regulated (automated or paper) and to the number and type of institutions covered (Flaherty 1989).…”