2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-019-00656-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating quack medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 , the existence of a bribe establishes so the awareness and intent of the recipient (over and above that of the giver), demonstrating a case of statutory or agency capture based on an illegal and condemnable practice. This is finally a “classic case of passive predation” described by Leeson et al ( 2020 ), where public actors serve deliberately and selfishly private interests through the formulation or application of regulation (see below). 15…”
Section: A Framework For Analyzing Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 , the existence of a bribe establishes so the awareness and intent of the recipient (over and above that of the giver), demonstrating a case of statutory or agency capture based on an illegal and condemnable practice. This is finally a “classic case of passive predation” described by Leeson et al ( 2020 ), where public actors serve deliberately and selfishly private interests through the formulation or application of regulation (see below). 15…”
Section: A Framework For Analyzing Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 On the contrary, as suggested by theories of regulatory capture, economic actors may influence the state to put in place regulations that limit competition in markets and ultimately harm public welfare, as asserted by Stigler ( 1971 ). Finally, as proposed by Leeson et al ( 2020 ), these theoretical approaches may be combined through “passive predation”, to be distinguished from “active predation”. The latter refers to a state that seeks to “suppress political competitors or expropriate citizens' property”, using coercive means if necessary, while the former refers to “the state serving as a vehicle for the designs of private parties on each other” and “suppressing their competitors in the market or diverting the incomes of fellow citizens to their benefit” by means of regulation (p. 274).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By a predatory state, we mean a state that "would specify a set of property rights that maximized the revenue of the group in power, regardless of its impact on the wealth of the society as a whole" (North 1981, p. 22). It would promote the private interests of dominant groups inside the state (such as politicians, the army and bureaucrats) or influential private groups with effective lobbying powers (Leeson et al 2019;Vahabi et al 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vahabi, Batifoulier and Da Silva also refer to the American experience of fraternal social welfare organizations predating the New Deal and the rise of the welfare state there, and ask whether the state re-appropriation effect was at work in other parts of the world. Leeson et al (2019) also treat all types of state, including a liberal democratic one, as predatory. However, they suggest a distinction between a 'passive' and an 'active' predatory state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 Recent contributions in this vein include Fuller (2019), Leeson et al (2019), and Rouanet and Piano (2019). Allen (2018) discusses the methodology of the Barzelian approach to institutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%