2020
DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpaa001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating Digital Platforms in China: Current Practice and Future Developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, legal scholar Yang Cao has noted that China has adopted a ‘less stringent attitude towards digital platforms’, maybe in a bid to establish its ‘internet sovereignty home and abroad’ (Mckune & Shazeda, 2018, p. 3850), while its ‘antitrust legislation and implementation rules’ seem to have been ‘heavily based on Western rules’ (Cao, 2020, p. 2). Similarly, de Kloet et al, have called for ‘[steering] away from geopolitical binarism’ to avoid reinforcing ‘the dichotomy of China versus the West’ (2019, p. 250).…”
Section: The Brussels Effect and Online Content Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, legal scholar Yang Cao has noted that China has adopted a ‘less stringent attitude towards digital platforms’, maybe in a bid to establish its ‘internet sovereignty home and abroad’ (Mckune & Shazeda, 2018, p. 3850), while its ‘antitrust legislation and implementation rules’ seem to have been ‘heavily based on Western rules’ (Cao, 2020, p. 2). Similarly, de Kloet et al, have called for ‘[steering] away from geopolitical binarism’ to avoid reinforcing ‘the dichotomy of China versus the West’ (2019, p. 250).…”
Section: The Brussels Effect and Online Content Governancementioning
confidence: 99%