Critical Discursive Psychology
DOI: 10.1057/9781137505279.0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating Criticism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to identify what is conveyed and discursively constructed in the news media, this study draws on governmentality (Foucault, 1994;Rose, 1999) and a rhetorical approach (Potter, 1996;Potter and Edwards, 1992;Potter and Wetherell, 2001;Semino, 2008). Governmentality are conceptualised as power and authority relations which affect the identities of individuals.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify what is conveyed and discursively constructed in the news media, this study draws on governmentality (Foucault, 1994;Rose, 1999) and a rhetorical approach (Potter, 1996;Potter and Edwards, 1992;Potter and Wetherell, 2001;Semino, 2008). Governmentality are conceptualised as power and authority relations which affect the identities of individuals.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, admitting to bad judgment is not seen as a sign of bad character, but rather as an admission of a bad decision or a mistake (Vaughan, 1999) and therefore less blameworthy. In addition, responsibility for bad judgment can be more readily externalized and redirected to a collective (Edwards and Potter, 1992; Whittle and Mueller, 2012). The professionals in our study did so by attributing their mistakes to the profession’s shared precrisis mindset, which they argued had colored their interpretations and influenced their decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, discursive psychology has been heavily influenced by conversation analysis, which uncovers interaction practices through detailed microanalysis of naturally occurring interaction situations (Edwards & Potter, 1992 ; Potter, 2010 ; Wiggins, 2017 ). The starting point for conversation analytic investigations is the observation that each utterance obtains its “meaning” in relation to the prior utterances (EA, 2007 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%