2007 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icma.2007.4303779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulated Sliding Mode Control of a Biped Robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 and 14, both measures (MHS and ZMP) predict the same time for tip-over initialization (at the time about 1.4 S where both measures become zero), yet the MHS alerts the system or its operator (in the case of teleportation) by its gradual decrease. Note that in contrast to the ZMP, which does not provide any valid information during the phase of fall, [1][2], MHS is proportional to the severity of instability and indicating the tip-over angular acceleration.…”
Section: B Mhs Measure Response Explorationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 and 14, both measures (MHS and ZMP) predict the same time for tip-over initialization (at the time about 1.4 S where both measures become zero), yet the MHS alerts the system or its operator (in the case of teleportation) by its gradual decrease. Note that in contrast to the ZMP, which does not provide any valid information during the phase of fall, [1][2], MHS is proportional to the severity of instability and indicating the tip-over angular acceleration.…”
Section: B Mhs Measure Response Explorationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Vukobratovic has introduced the prescribed synergy method to design the upper body motion considering stability factor, [1]. A stable trajectory for a biped robot and implementation of a Regulated Sliding Mode Control (SMC) on the biped robot has been also proposed, [2]. However, it should be noted that the most important factor in investigation of biped robots is the stability consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Then, generated trajectories in the task space are projected into the joint space to yield desired joint trajectories, using inverse kinematics 12 . Finally, the low-level control system is responsible for tracking the obtained desired trajectories [13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Moosavian et al have presented various studies on dynamics modeling of a planar seven-link biped robot in joint space and its control in single and double support phase. 11,12 However, some studies on design of stable gait planning include design in both joint and task spaces. It means, some points are considered as the important points in the task space and then by using various methods and novelties, their trajectories are calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%