2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularized integral equation methods for elastic scattering problems in three dimensions

Abstract: This paper presents novel methodologies for the numerical simulation of scattering of elastic waves by both closed and open surfaces in three-dimensional space. The proposed approach utilizes new integral formulations as well as an extension to the elastic context of the efficient high-order singularintegration methods [12] introduced recently for the acoustic case. In order to obtain formulations leading to iterative solvers (GMRES) which converge in small numbers of iterations we investigate, theoretically a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much less works are devoted to the construction of regularized CFIE for the Navier equation. For example, in [37], the authors derived a new regularized CFIE for 3D elastic scattering problems and the approach introduced in Section 10 is extended in [49] to the case of the Neumann boundary condition.…”
Section: Additional Contributions and Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much less works are devoted to the construction of regularized CFIE for the Navier equation. For example, in [37], the authors derived a new regularized CFIE for 3D elastic scattering problems and the approach introduced in Section 10 is extended in [49] to the case of the Neumann boundary condition.…”
Section: Additional Contributions and Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, however, the advantage does not carry over to the Dirichlet case, since the evaluation of the N˜wSw operator is significantly more costly, computationally, than the evaluation of the (inexpensive) operator S w : the reduction in iteration numbers resulting from use of the N˜wSw formulation does not compensate for the additional cost per iteration it entails. Thus use of the first‐kind S w ‐based formulation is recommended for the Dirichlet open‐arc elastic case while the N w S w is suggested for the Neumann problem, see Reference 27 for a similar observation in the three‐dimensional elastic case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…associated with the WGF method for the solution of the Dirichlet and Neumann problems. For the numerical implementation in 3D, in turn, we utilize the methods presented in [12,17].…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%