2008
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/124/1/012021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularization schemes involving self-similarity in imaging inverse problems

Abstract: In this paper we introduce and analyze a set of regularization expressions based on self-similarity properties of images in order to address the classical inverse problem of image denoising and the ill-posed inverse problem of single-frame image zooming. The regularization expressions introduced are constructed using either the fractal image transform or the newly developed "Nonlocal-means (NL-means) image denoising filter" of Buades et al. (2005). We exploit these regularization terms in a global MAP-based fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this issue, a classical approach consists of penalizing the data fitting terms derived from the linear models (4) and the noise statistics (3) with additional regularizing terms exploiting any prior information on the latent image. Various penalizations have been considered in the literature, including Tikhonov regularizations expressed in the image domain [21], [35] or in a transformed (e.g., gradient) domain [36], [37], dictionary-or patch-based regularizations [25], [30], total variation (TV) [23], [38] or regularizations based on sparse wavelet representations [39], [40].…”
Section: Robust Multiband Image Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this issue, a classical approach consists of penalizing the data fitting terms derived from the linear models (4) and the noise statistics (3) with additional regularizing terms exploiting any prior information on the latent image. Various penalizations have been considered in the literature, including Tikhonov regularizations expressed in the image domain [21], [35] or in a transformed (e.g., gradient) domain [36], [37], dictionary-or patch-based regularizations [25], [30], total variation (TV) [23], [38] or regularizations based on sparse wavelet representations [39], [40].…”
Section: Robust Multiband Image Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regularization term can be chosen from a specific task of interest, the information resulting from previous experiments or from a perceptual view on the constraints affecting the unknown model parameters [31], [32]. Various priors or regularizations have already been advocated to regularize the image SR problem include: (i) traditional generic image priors such as Tikhonov [24], [33], [34], the total variation (TV) [18], [20], [35] and the sparsity in transformed domains [36]- [39], (ii) more recently proposed image regularizations such as the gradient profile prior [8], [9], [17] or Fattal's edge statistics [40] and (iii) learning-based priors [41], [42]. The fast approach proposed in the next section is shown to be adapted to many of the existing regularization terms.…”
Section: B Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the target image x is a priori close to the imagex. The imagex can be an estimation of the HR image, Algorithm 1 FSR With Image-Domain ℓ 2 -Regularization: Implementation of the Analytical Solution (15) e.g., an interpolated version of the observed image, a restored image obtained with learning-based algorithms [7] or a cleaner image obtained from other sensors [24], [34], [48]. In such case, using Theorem 1, the solution of the problem 14iŝ…”
Section: B Solution Of the ℓ 2 -ℓ 2 Problem In The Image Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To overcome this issue, a classical approach consists of penalizing the data fitting terms derived from the linear models (4) and the noise statistics (3) with additional regularizing terms exploiting any prior information on the latent image. Various penalizations have been considered in the literature, including Tikhonov regularizations expressed in the image domain [21], [36] or a in a transformed (e.g., gradient) domain [37], [38], dictionary-or patch-based regularizations [26], [31], total variation (TV) [23], [39] or regularizations based on sparse wavelet representations [40], [41].…”
Section: Robust Multi-band Image Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%