2014
DOI: 10.3414/me12-01-0109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularization in Deformable Registration of Biomedical Images Based on Divergence and Curl Operators

Abstract: The implemented divergence/curl regularization was successfully tested, leading to promising results in comparison with competitive regularization methods. Future work is required to establish parameter tuning and reduce the computational cost.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent optimizer with pixel level step size was used to minimize a cost function (Equation 1) to obtain the transformation ( T ) between baseline ( I b ) and follow-up ( I f ) images: Cfalse(T,Ib°Iffalse)=Csim+αCReg where C sim was a similarity metric, C reg was a regularization term, and α was a weight that balanced the two terms. We used Sum of Square Difference (SSD) as C sim (Hill et al ) and bending energy of transformation (Equation 2) as C reg (Riyahi-Alam et al , 2014): CReg=Ebending=truetrue(2Tx2)2+(2Ty2)2+(2Tz2)2+(2Txy)2+(2Txz)2+(2Tyz)2This function penalized discontinuity in DVF such as folding/tearing, but had no impact on sink (converging) and source (diverging) vectors which we intended to preserve. Converging vectors create a sink point that is mapped to many points in its vicinity and represents a morphological shrinkage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent optimizer with pixel level step size was used to minimize a cost function (Equation 1) to obtain the transformation ( T ) between baseline ( I b ) and follow-up ( I f ) images: Cfalse(T,Ib°Iffalse)=Csim+αCReg where C sim was a similarity metric, C reg was a regularization term, and α was a weight that balanced the two terms. We used Sum of Square Difference (SSD) as C sim (Hill et al ) and bending energy of transformation (Equation 2) as C reg (Riyahi-Alam et al , 2014): CReg=Ebending=truetrue(2Tx2)2+(2Ty2)2+(2Tz2)2+(2Txy)2+(2Txz)2+(2Tyz)2This function penalized discontinuity in DVF such as folding/tearing, but had no impact on sink (converging) and source (diverging) vectors which we intended to preserve. Converging vectors create a sink point that is mapped to many points in its vicinity and represents a morphological shrinkage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyze how physically logic the registration method is, an application to obtain a minimum Jacobian determinant of the transformation (deformation field) for each warped frame of the sequences is implemented [5]. This metric investigates on the singularities of the DF.…”
Section: Dat Registration Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the type of a transformation function, it is referred to as a linear or deformable registration [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have assessed the accuracy of DIR algorithms using digital phantoms, (10) physically deforming phantoms, (11) mathematical descriptors, 12 , 13 and clinical CT scans 14 , 15 , 16 . Digital (10) or physically deforming phantom studies, (11) while useful, may lack clinical complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital (10) or physically deforming phantom studies, (11) while useful, may lack clinical complexity. Mathematical descriptors, such as curl and the Jacobian, have been proposed as useful metrics to quantify the deformation vector field 12 , 13 . Though such descriptors could be beneficial in the future, they are untested clinically and lack intuitive clinical meaning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%