2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2010.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity theorems, up to the boundary, for shear thickening flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the framework of implicitly constituted fluids characterized by (A1)-(A5) is more general than the setting considered in previous studies, the result established in Theorem 1.1 provides large-data existence theory to a broader class of models in comparison with earlier studies (we refer the reader to the survey paper [43] and the recent studies [15,19] for detailed summaries on long-time and large-data analysis of power-law-type models). In particular, it follows from Theorem 1.1 and Lemma 1.1 that (for large-data) there is weak solution to Bingham or Herschel-Bulkley fluids (1.28) (or (1.14) with ν(s) ∼ s r−2 ) if r > 6 5 in three spatial dimensions-the result that is not covered by any of the previous studies. 9 The class of fluids, to which the result is applicable, is, however, much larger, as indicated in subsection 1.1.…”
Section: Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the framework of implicitly constituted fluids characterized by (A1)-(A5) is more general than the setting considered in previous studies, the result established in Theorem 1.1 provides large-data existence theory to a broader class of models in comparison with earlier studies (we refer the reader to the survey paper [43] and the recent studies [15,19] for detailed summaries on long-time and large-data analysis of power-law-type models). In particular, it follows from Theorem 1.1 and Lemma 1.1 that (for large-data) there is weak solution to Bingham or Herschel-Bulkley fluids (1.28) (or (1.14) with ν(s) ∼ s r−2 ) if r > 6 5 in three spatial dimensions-the result that is not covered by any of the previous studies. 9 The class of fluids, to which the result is applicable, is, however, much larger, as indicated in subsection 1.1.…”
Section: Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…See Schwedoff[54], Troutan[61], and further references in books on non-Newtonian fluids, such as Bird, Amstrong, and Hassager[9], Huilgol[31], and Schowalter[53], or in the survey paper[44].2 Theoretical analysis initiated by Ladyzhenskaya[35,36] (see also Lions[37]) has developed extensively during the last few decades; see, for example, studies of different types[6,7,10,19,18,28,38,39,40,62].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author shows that the second "tangential" derivatives belong to L 2 (R 3 + ), while the second "normal" derivatives belong to some L l loc (R 3 + ), for a suitable l < 2. See [9] and [10] for recent, and more general, related results (under the non-slip boundary condition), and for references.…”
Section: Independence Of the Compatibility Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…had generalized these results to p > 8 5 in [23] and p > 6 5 in [24]. There are also many papers dealing with regularity of for evolution Dirichlet boundary problems and we refer instance to [3,4,16,8,9,10,11]. For the study of these models with space periodic boundary conditions, we refer to the monograph [34] and papers [14,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results of regularity up to boundary for the Dirichlet problems were obtained by T. Shinlkin [41] and H. Beirão da Veiga, et.al. [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%