2017
DOI: 10.3934/mcrf.2017007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity results for a time-optimal control problem in the space of probability measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18]. Instead, more recent developments in the non-linear case (based on generalization of differential inclusions) have been recently described in [14,15,16].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[18]. Instead, more recent developments in the non-linear case (based on generalization of differential inclusions) have been recently described in [14,15,16].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now give an example in the 2D case. Consider the initial data µ 0 and the target µ 1 defined by µ 0 := 1 8 × 1 (0,4)×(1,3) dx, µ 1 := 1 16 × 1 (8,14)×(0,4)\(9,13)×(1,3) dx.…”
Section: Example 2: the 2d Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A time-optimal control problem in the space of probability measures endowed with the topology induced by the Wasserstein metric has been introduced in [9,10,11,12], where the dynamics is given by a controlled continuity equation in the space of probability measures, which naturally arises as an infinite-dimensional counterpart of a finite-dimensional differential inclusion.…”
Section: Giulia Cavagnari Antonio Marigonda and Benedetto Piccolimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statement of the problem and preliminary results. We define now the objects considered in the present study, recalling the definition of admissible masspreserving trajectory stated in [9,10,11,12].…”
Section: Definition 22 (Standing Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this appendix section, we recall some estimates used throughout the paper, borrowed from [13,16] (Lemma 2 and Lemma 3.1 respectively).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%