1989
DOI: 10.4171/rmi/82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity of $p$-Harmonic Functions on the Plane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
104
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the known local regularity results for such equations, k is larger than 2 in many notable cases. These results generalize those in [13], which were established only for the p-Laplacian. Furthermore, local results are extended to obtain a global regularity result in some cases.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike the known local regularity results for such equations, k is larger than 2 in many notable cases. These results generalize those in [13], which were established only for the p-Laplacian. Furthermore, local results are extended to obtain a global regularity result in some cases.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…From this result it was pointed out in [21] that global W3'P(), C2'2/p-1(=), and WI-f-2/P,P(') regularity can indeed be achieved for solutions of the p-Laplacian in some physically relevant cases, though this result is only applicable to a limited class of boundary data. It should be noted that the results in [13] are sharp and such high-order regularity (local or global) is not generally true for the case p 5 0; see, for example, [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also point out that in the case n = 2 Manfredi [Man88] showed that one can actually take α = μ. Interestingly, p-harmonic functions in the plane enjoy much higher regularity when p → 1, as shown by Iwaniec and Manfredi [IM89], however it is impossible to trace the constants in terms of u L ∞ (B 1 ) .…”
Section: Theorem 24 (Density Propertymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The proof of Lemma 2 can be found in [4], [14] or [21] and in fact is true when B(w, 4r) ∩ Ω ⊂ R n . In R 2 the best Hölder exponent in Lemma 2 is known when p > 2 while for 1 < p ≤ 2 a solution has continuous second partials (see [12]). Proof.…”
Section: Lemma 2 Let U Be As In Lemma 1 Then U Has a Representative Inmentioning
confidence: 99%