2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2018.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity for an anisotropic equation in the plane

Abstract: We present a simple proof of the C 1 regularity of p-anisotropic functions in the plane for 2 ≤ p < ∞. We achieve a logarithmic modulus of continuity for the derivatives. The monotonicity (in the sense of Lebesgue) of the derivatives is used. The case with two exponents is also included.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the desired Lipschitz regularity can be inferred from [ (2) in [1,Main Theorem], local minimizers were proven to be C 1 , in the two-dimensional case, for 1 < p < ∞ and when δ 1 = · · · = δ N = 0. We also refer to the very recent paper [14], where a modulus of continuity for the gradient of local mimizers is exhibited. We do not know whether such a result still holds in higher dimensions;…”
Section: Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the desired Lipschitz regularity can be inferred from [ (2) in [1,Main Theorem], local minimizers were proven to be C 1 , in the two-dimensional case, for 1 < p < ∞ and when δ 1 = · · · = δ N = 0. We also refer to the very recent paper [14], where a modulus of continuity for the gradient of local mimizers is exhibited. We do not know whether such a result still holds in higher dimensions;…”
Section: Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter relies on a lemma on the oscillation of monotone functions due to Lebesgue [5] and the fact that derivatives of solutions are monotone (in the sense of Lebesgue). The purpose of this work is to extend this result to the case 1 < p < 2 employing methods developed in [6]. We obtain the following:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It was proved by Bousquet and Brasco in [1] that weak solutions of (1.1) for 1 < p < ∞ are C 1 (Ω). A simple proof which gives a logarithmic modulus of continuity for the derivatives is contained in [6] for the case p ≥ 2. The latter relies on a lemma on the oscillation of monotone functions due to Lebesgue [5] and the fact that derivatives of solutions are monotone (in the sense of Lebesgue).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the anisotropic elliptic or parabolic equations attract much attention, in other words, people turn to study of the anisotropic p ‐Laplacian equations, where the anisotropic operator is normalΔtruepu=i=1nxi(|uxi|pi2uxi),where truep is a constant vector, p=false{p1,p2,,pnfalse}, we refer to [2, 6, 9–13, 15, 16, 23, 25, 26, 29, 35] and their references. In especially, we would like to mention the result of Agnese DI Castro, Eugenio Montefusco [12] who considered the following anisotropic quasilinear degenerate elliptic equations {0truei=1nxi(|xiufalse|pi2xiutrue)=λfalse|ufalse|q2u0.33em0.33em0.33emin0.33emnormalΩ,u=0onΩ,where Ω is a bounded subset of Rn, λ=const>0 and assume pi are ordered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%