2012
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regular Exercise, Subjective Wellbeing, and Internalizing Problems in Adolescence: Causality or Genetic Pleiotropy?

Abstract: This study tests in a genetically informative design whether exercise behavior causally influences subjective wellbeing (SWB) and internalizing problems (INT). If exercise causally influences SWB and INT, genetic and environmental factors influencing exercise behavior will also influence SWB and INT. Furthermore, within genetically identical (MZ) twin pairs, the twin who exercises more should also show higher levels of SWB and lower levels of INT, than the co-twin who exercises less, because genetic confoundin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the Cantril ladder [Cantril, 1965] was administered to evaluate general quality of life on an 11-point scale with 0 indicating the worst possible life and 10 the best possible life. Previous psychometric analysis has shown that the correlation between the latent factor scores of these three measures of subjective wellbeing range between 0.70 and 0.95, indicating that a dimensional score combining these three measures is a valid and reliable measure of overall subjective wellbeing [Bartels et al, 2012]. Based on these findings, these three scales were combined to form one overall subjective measure of wellbeing in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Finally, the Cantril ladder [Cantril, 1965] was administered to evaluate general quality of life on an 11-point scale with 0 indicating the worst possible life and 10 the best possible life. Previous psychometric analysis has shown that the correlation between the latent factor scores of these three measures of subjective wellbeing range between 0.70 and 0.95, indicating that a dimensional score combining these three measures is a valid and reliable measure of overall subjective wellbeing [Bartels et al, 2012]. Based on these findings, these three scales were combined to form one overall subjective measure of wellbeing in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…35 A further possibility is that factors, such as the brain-derived neurotrophic fac-netic factors predict activity and depressive symptoms. 37,38 Although we cannot rule out this possibility, how it could explain the time-varying, bidirectional association seen in our study remains unclear.…”
Section: Interpretation and Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Given that not only the genetic correlations, but also the environmental correlations and the cross-trait correlations between the MZ twin difference scores were significant (the latter two with the exception of ‘Benefits’ and ‘Embarrassment’ in males), the data are indeed compatible with a causal effect of attitudes on exercise behavior, in that a different pattern might have led to falsification of this hypothesis. Such falsification was for instance illustrated for the effects of exercise behavior on mental health (de Moor et al 2008) and subjective well-being (Bartels et al 2012). However, it should be noted that the data do not constitute proof of causality, and that due to the cross-sectional design, the direction of any causality remains unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%