2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9893-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regrowth of embryogenic tissues of Pinus nigra following cryopreservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The mass cell population could be attributed due to selection process; elimination of non embryonic cells from cultures or it may be due to increase synchrony of development of embryonic cells (Salaj et al, 2011). Hence, similar fi nding in present study show that cryopreserved PLBs of DBM retain high meristematic cells growing property after 18 months regenerated from vitrifi cation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…1). The mass cell population could be attributed due to selection process; elimination of non embryonic cells from cultures or it may be due to increase synchrony of development of embryonic cells (Salaj et al, 2011). Hence, similar fi nding in present study show that cryopreserved PLBs of DBM retain high meristematic cells growing property after 18 months regenerated from vitrifi cation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this study, in eight lines of ET (K1, K2, S3-S5, S7 -P. abies and AK2.2, AK2.9 -P. omorika) and the ET line recovered after cryostorage (AK2.6 -P. omorika), mutations occurred at more than one locus which suggests generally lower stability of their genomes. Other studies also indicated genotypedependent occurrence of somaclonal variation (Marum et al, 2009, Salaj et al, 2011. A recent study of Bradai et al (2016) on somaclonal variation in olive plants revealed clear relationship between genotype and susceptibility to the morphological and physiological alternations of regenerated plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since both these processes may induce somaclonal variation (Sarmast, 2016), their influence needs to be evaluated and the obtained results might guide the improvement of propagation protocols. Also, our previous investigations were limited only to a single genotype which precludes any general concluding with regard to the intrinsic factors of somaclonal variation, i.e., genotypespecific propensity to mutate which is also a highly discussed issue in terms of somaclonal variability (Sahijram et al, 2003;Marum et al, 2009, Salaj et al, 2011, Bradai et al, 2016. In this work we wanted to asses if the prolonged time of in vitro proliferation and storage in LN affects the genetic integrity of genomes of two spruce species, P. abies and P. omorika.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAPD technology has previously been used successfully to detect occurrence of genetic alterations (Finkle et al, 1985;Harding, 1997;Aronen et al, 1999;Ahuja et al, 2002;Urbanova´ et al, 2005;Castillo et al, 2010), but this approach possesses limits with reproducibility, and it is currently being replaced by techniques such as Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs) and/or Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs, microsatellites). These techniques are now being used to consider more carefully the issue of genetic fidelity after cryo-procedures, especially in the breeding of long-living conifers (Salaj et al, 2010), where genetic changes might be substantially expressed only later on, in mature trees.…”
Section: Variation In Cryopreserved Derived Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%