1995
DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol16-no3-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regrets or No Regrets-That is the Question: Is Conservation a Costless C02 Mitigation Strategy?

Abstract: Based on sectoral, or partial equilibrium, analyses, energy conservation has been offered as a "no regrets" COz mitigation strategy. Ours is the first study to isolate key features of conservation strategies in a general equilibrium context. The results indicate that conservation would have slightly negative effects on the U.S. economy overall, in addition to sizable negative effects on most energy industries. Thus, while conservation may be a worthy C02 mitigation strategy, it should not be oversold as costle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…under CDM or in the absence of CDM) and the scale of the DSM program. Although the existing literature, such as Dufournaud et al (1994) and Rose and Lin (1995), argue that a DSM program would lead to negative welfare implications, our study finds that not all DSM programs are regressive in Thailand. The DSM options with sound project economics (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…under CDM or in the absence of CDM) and the scale of the DSM program. Although the existing literature, such as Dufournaud et al (1994) and Rose and Lin (1995), argue that a DSM program would lead to negative welfare implications, our study finds that not all DSM programs are regressive in Thailand. The DSM options with sound project economics (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The pure conservation case led to indirect effects of 9.8 percent, while the pure substitution case led to indirect effects of only 4.7 percent. The reason for the greater negative indirect effects for conservation stem from the reduced demand for direct and indirect inputs, which more than offset the efficiency improvement (see also Rose and Lin, 1995). Note that the case presented in Table 2 has indirect effects halfway between the results of the pure case simulations (not shown), but other features of the results reflect the nonlinearity of the CGE model.…”
Section: Water Disruption Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, substitution of other inputs for electricity has a cost-increasing effect, but stimulates upstream demands for a different set of inputs. Thus, the two sets of responses will have different general equilibrium outcomes (see, e.g., Rose and Lin, 1995). devastating effects that a disaster can have.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implementation of hydropower projects under the CDM does not imply that the entire hydropower projects are financed by Annex I countries. It is only the Sources: Bo¨hringer and Rutherford (1997), Jemio and Jansen (1993), Rose and Lin (1995), Welsch (1998) and Zhang (1997). 4 A similar approach has been used in a number of existing general equilibrium models (e.g., Jorgenson and Wilcoxen, 1993;Bo¨hringer and Rutherford, 1997;Shoven and Whalley, 1992;Ballard et al, 1985).…”
Section: Modeling Of the Cdm Optionmentioning
confidence: 98%