2019
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regression‐based machine‐learning approaches to predict task activation using resting‐state fMRI

Abstract: Resting-state fMRI has shown the ability to predict task activation on an individual basis by using a general linear model (GLM) to map resting-state network features to activation z-scores. The question remains whether the relatively simplistic GLM is the best approach to accomplish this prediction. In this study, several regressionbased machine-learning approaches were compared, including GLMs, feed-forward neural networks, and random forest bootstrap aggregation (bagging). Resting-state and task data from 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivated by recent progress in establishing a stronger link between spontaneous and task-evoked activity, we examine the problem of mapping rsfMRI measurements to patterns of activity elicited during tfMRI-based experimental paradigms in individual subjects. We show additional evidence that it is indeed possible to predict task activity maps from patterns of rsfMRI FC, as previously reported [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]23 . However, we emphasized early on that observing higher intra-subject prediction scores compared to inter-subject scores was not a useful observation we believed provided informative predictions-they needed perform better than what any naive group averaging could predict on the cortical surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Motivated by recent progress in establishing a stronger link between spontaneous and task-evoked activity, we examine the problem of mapping rsfMRI measurements to patterns of activity elicited during tfMRI-based experimental paradigms in individual subjects. We show additional evidence that it is indeed possible to predict task activity maps from patterns of rsfMRI FC, as previously reported [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]23 . However, we emphasized early on that observing higher intra-subject prediction scores compared to inter-subject scores was not a useful observation we believed provided informative predictions-they needed perform better than what any naive group averaging could predict on the cortical surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…performance for a large number of target contrasts. Notably, these results not only predict individual subject differences, i.e., 'connectome-fingerprints' 21,22 , as many have previously shown [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]23 ; they provide support that whole-cortex prediction by a model exceeds what any kind of group averaging, i.e., baselines, could achieve-a point we will reiterate the importance of.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, investigating sex differences at the level of BOLD fluctuation may reveal if there is strong evidence of sex differences. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques have been used widely to perform classification and regression on neuroscience data (Al Zoubi, Awad, & Kasabov, 2018;Al Zoubi, Ki Wong, et al, 2018;Campbell et al, 2020;Cohen, Chen, Parker Jones, Niu, & Wang, 2020;Du, Fu, & Calhoun, 2018;Garner et al, 2019;Kazeminejad & Sotero, 2019;Saccà et al, 2019). Some works focused on using ML for classifying subjects into male and female using functional (Ktena et al, 2018;Zhang, Dougherty, Baum, White, & Michael, 2018) and structural data (Chekroud et al, 2016;Feis, Brodersen, von Cramon, Luders, & Tittgemeyer, 2013;Rosenblatt, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. This topic has been addressed in numerous studies [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . Here we re-examined methods that address this problem using machine learning techniques with only functional data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%