2015
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v126.23.4514.4514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG) in the Czech Republic

Abstract: Introduction: Collection of valid data in patients with hematologic malignancies remains a challenge. Especially low grade malignancies require long term follow-up and valid high quality data. The RMG registry was established in 2007 and has become one of the flagship projects of the Czech Myeloma group. To date, four parts of the registry are active - module for multiple myeloma (MM), monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS), AL amyloidosis (ALA) and Waldeströms macroglobulinemia. The later… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the RMG has mature OS data and is representative of the national and international patient populations. For these reasons, the RMG was selected for development of the RSA (Radocha et al , ). Data were collected from all 20 of the Czech centres that actively treat patients with MM; these centres cover approximately 80% of all patients with MM in the Czech Republic (Radocha et al , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the RMG has mature OS data and is representative of the national and international patient populations. For these reasons, the RMG was selected for development of the RSA (Radocha et al , ). Data were collected from all 20 of the Czech centres that actively treat patients with MM; these centres cover approximately 80% of all patients with MM in the Czech Republic (Radocha et al , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, the RMG was selected for development of the RSA (Radocha et al , ). Data were collected from all 20 of the Czech centres that actively treat patients with MM; these centres cover approximately 80% of all patients with MM in the Czech Republic (Radocha et al , ). Data collection began in May 2007, and patients were observed from diagnosis until either death, loss to follow‐up or 26 April 2016.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG) is one of the largest of its kind and contains data on a substantial number of patients with MM initiating 2L treatment [15], as well as mature OS data and information on a large number of parameters [15]. This RSA was developed using validated and quality-controlled data that were collected between May 2007 and April 2016.…”
Section: Selection Of a Suitable Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This RSA was developed using validated and quality-controlled data that were collected between May 2007 and April 2016. Informed consent was granted in the original study of the RMG [15]. The data in this study are based on a previously conducted study, and informed consent was granted in the original study.…”
Section: Selection Of a Suitable Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observational databases, however, capture characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving treatment in real life: the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG), for instance, captures a wide range of data of MM patients in the Czech Republic, and comparisons across published studies demonstrate that differences exist between RCTs and the RW, e.g. outcomes of patients treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) are considerably lower in RW patients compared with those in recent RCTs [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Additionally, the limited time duration of RCTs pose an extra hurdle for the generalisation of economic model results in the RW, as the time horizon of economic models often requires extrapolation of clinical data well beyond the trial duration; [17] in registries and observational databases patients may be followed for longer periods and consequently the uncertainty around long-term estimates may be considerably lower than that obtained as a result of extrapolation of trial data [9,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%