2005
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of the Essex × Forrest Recombinant Inbred Line Mapping Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essex is characterized as having purple flowers, gray pubescence, a group V maturity, average protein, oil, height and yield and is moderately susceptible to sudden death syndrome (SDS) (Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines nee F.virguliforme Aoki; Lightfoot et al 2005;Yesudas et al, 2013). Williams 82 was developed by the USDA-ARS and the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station by combining four individual BC 6 F 3 plants selected after a series of backcrosses to 'Williams' to transfer the Rps1k gene from Kingwa (Bernard and Cremeens, 1988).…”
Section: Population Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essex is characterized as having purple flowers, gray pubescence, a group V maturity, average protein, oil, height and yield and is moderately susceptible to sudden death syndrome (SDS) (Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines nee F.virguliforme Aoki; Lightfoot et al 2005;Yesudas et al, 2013). Williams 82 was developed by the USDA-ARS and the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station by combining four individual BC 6 F 3 plants selected after a series of backcrosses to 'Williams' to transfer the Rps1k gene from Kingwa (Bernard and Cremeens, 1988).…”
Section: Population Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was conducted by testing plants of four soybean (Glycine max) genotypes with contrasting genes for resistance to soybean cyst nematode (LD00-2817P [Diers et al, 2010] and LDX01-1-65 [Diers et al, 2005]) or sudden disease syndrome caused by Fusarium virguliforme (Ripley [de Farias Neto et al, 2007] and EF59 [Lightfoot et al, 2005]), as well as the 97 F3:4 (here after called as F3) lines from a cross between LD00-2817P (Diers et al, 2010) and LDX01-1-65. The lines from the LD00-2817P by LDX01-1-65 cross are the same lines that were used to test combinations of soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) resistance genes from PI 437654, PI 88788, and Peking that were bred into LD00-2817 and from Glycine soja PI 468916 that were bred into LDX01-1-65 (Kim et al, 2011).…”
Section: Plant Materials and Mamp Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QTL could be assigned to linkage group U10b (Lark et al 1995) and the C1 linkage group of the composite soybean map (Song et al 2004). However, this locus might be the same as the QTL identified by A63I-1 in greenhouse assays of F. solani resistance in Essex by Forrest (ExF; Torto et al 1996;Lightfoot et al 2005).…”
Section: Markers Associated With Ds In the Greenhousementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlations of SDS resistance with planting date and morphological traits such as growth habit, maturity, leaf morphology and stem morphology are significant (Gibson et al 1994;Rupe et al 1994;Rupe and Gbur 1995;Njiti et al 1996Njiti et al , 2002. Therefore, resistance gene mapping studies must be carefully designed to exclude these sources of variability (Hnetkovsky et al 1996;Lightfoot et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%