2012
DOI: 10.3198/jpr2011.10.0555crc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of ‘Riley’ Winter Canola

Abstract: ‘Riley’ (Reg. No. CV‐24, PI 663949), a canola‐quality winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.), was developed and released by the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Riley is a selection from the cross with pedigree KS3580/‘Jetton.’ Riley was tested in regional yield trials as the experimental variety KS4158 and was an entry in the National Winter Canola Variety Trial from 2008 through 2010. Riley was released because of its disease tolerance, improved oil content, and superior yield compared with ‘Wichita’… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a), which is more than double the actual yields reported by many researchers in the United States and Canada (Harker et al, 2012;Nielsen et al, 2012;Stamm et al, 2012). The mean yield of 2.0 Mg ha -1 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2a), which is more than double the actual yields reported by many researchers in the United States and Canada (Harker et al, 2012;Nielsen et al, 2012;Stamm et al, 2012). The mean yield of 2.0 Mg ha -1 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Our analysis of National Winter Canola Variety Trial data indicated that with optimal weather conditions, best crop management practices, and best available genetics, canola has a potential yield of up to 7 Mg ha -1 ( Fig. 2a), which is more than double the actual yields reported by many researchers in the United States and Canada (Harker et al, 2012;Nielsen et al, 2012;Stamm et al, 2012). The mean yield of 2.0 Mg ha -1 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The SUR cultivars used for check comparisons include Sumner, ‘DKW46‐15’ (Godsey and Boyles, 2017), ‘HyCLASS115W’ (Bushong et al, 2018), and ‘HyCLASS225W’ (Bushong et al, 2018). ‘Riley’ (Stamm et al, 2012) and ‘Wichita’ (Rife et al, 2001) were used as conventional check cultivars.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, an analysis was performed across site‐years in Kansas using only cultivars shared by all trials. Analyses across years had site‐year and cultivar as fixed effects and replication (site‐year) as a random effect (Stamm et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variety was the whole plot randomly assigned within a replication, and forage harvest treatment was randomly assigned to subplots within whole plots. Whole plots included the cultivars Griffin, ‘Kiowa’ (Stamm, 2010), ‘Sitro’, and Wichita in 2008–2009; Griffin and Wichita in 2009–2010; and ‘Abilene’ (Rife et al, 2003), Griffin, Kiowa, Plainsman, ‘Riley’ (Stamm et al, 2012), Sumner, and Wichita in 2010–2011. The split‐plot forage harvest treatments were PRE (before a series of freezing temperatures less than −2.0°C), POST (following a series of freezing temperatures less than −2.0°C), SPRING (at bolting stage), and NONE (no harvest).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%