Registration of ‘Perry’ Peanut

Isleib, T. G.; Rice, P.; Bailey, Jack E.; Mozingo, R. W.; Pattee, H. E.

doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.0739

Cited by 43 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Georgia-07W, Georgia-06G, Georgia Greener, and GA 032902 had significantly higher dollar value return above variable cost per hectare compared to 'Florida-07' (Gorbet and Tillman, 2009), 'York', 'McCloud', 'Tifrunner' (Holbrook and Culbreath, 2007), 'C-99R' (Gorbet and Shokes, 2002), 'Carver' , 'AT-3085RO', 'AT-3081R' (Anderson and Harvey, 2006), 'AP-3', and 'Andru II' . Also in the same 2006 Max test (Table 4), Georgia-08V had significantly higher dollar value return above variable cost per hectare compared to the other virginia-type cultivars: 'Gregory' (Isleib et al, 1999), 'CHAMPS' (Mozingo et al, 2006), 'NC-V 11' (Wynne et al, 1991), and 'Perry' (Isleib et al, 2003). Similar results were found in the 2006 Min test.…”

Section: ------------------------------------% ----------------------supporting

confidence: 66%

Agronomic Performance and Economic Return among Peanut Genotypes with Maximum and Minimum Production Inputs

Branch¹,

Fletcher²

2010

Peanut Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maximum (Max) and minimum (Min) peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) input production tests were conducted for three consecutive years to evaluate agronomic performance and economic return among several runner and virginia genotypes. Mid-April planting dates were used each year. The Max tests included recommended production practices of seeding rate, fertilization, irrigation, and pesticides; whereas, the Min tests excluded irrigation, insecticides, and included only three fungicide sprays. Results showed variation among years, locations, and genotypes for TSWV and total disease incidence, pod yield, gross dollar value, and dollar value return above variable cost. The performance results also show the benefit to growers from agronomic and economic improvement with many of the newly released peanut cultivars in Georgia. Significant differences (P # 0.05) among the peanut genotypes for tomato spotted wilt disease [caused by Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV)] where noted. The lowest TSWV incidence was noted for the cultivars Georgia-06G,

show abstract

Section: ------------------------------------% ----------------------supporting

confidence: 66%

Agronomic Performance and Economic Return among Peanut Genotypes with Maximum and Minimum Production Inputs

Branch¹,

Fletcher²

2010

Peanut Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Preplant fumigation with metam-sodium has been used successfully for CBR control (Phipps, 1990), but it is expensive and requires significant management input. Therefore, identification and utilization of resistance to CBR have been emphasized in peanut breeding programs (Beute et al, 1976;Coffelt and Garren, 1982;Isleib et al, 1997Isleib et al, , 2003Wynne and Beute, 1983;Wynne et al, 1991).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…NC 3033, a virginia-type whose pedigree includes spanish-types, was released in 1976 as the first CBR-resistant germplasm (Beute et al, 1976). The NC breeding program has released several partially resistant virginia-type cultivars including 'NC 8C' (Wynne and Beute, 1983), 'NC 10C' (Wynne et al, 1991), 'NC 12C' (Isleib et al, 1997), and 'Perry' (Isleib et al, 2003). Georgia-02C, the first runner peanut cultivar with moderate resistance to CBR, was recently released (Branch, 2003).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Resistance to Cylindrocladium Parasiticum of Runner-Type Peanut in The Greenhouse and Field

Dong¹,

Holbrook²,

Culbreath³

2008

Peanut Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Identification and utilization of peanut cultivars with resistance to Cylindrocladium black rot (CBR) is a desirable approach to manage this disease. The objectives of this study were to improve greenhouse and field screening techniques for resistance to CBR, and to evaluate the reaction of selected runner-type peanut genotypes. Georgia-02C (moderately resistant to CBR) and C-99R (CBR-susceptible) were used in comparing the effectiveness of different inoculation methods in the greenhouse. Disease development was affected by both size and density of microsclerotia in soil. Use of microsclerotia at a size of ≥150 to <250 µm and a density of 1 to 5 microsclerotia/g soil provided the best separation the CBR-resistant cultivar Georgia-02C and the susceptible C-99R based on root rot severity. Genotypes with varying resistance to CBR were evaluated by growth in a naturally infested field, and by inoculating plants in the field and greenhouse. Disease incidence and severity at harvest were the most effective parameters for evaluating CBR resistance in the field and greenhouse, respectively. The cultivars Georgia-02C and Georganic had the lowest disease incidence, whereas C-99R and DP-1 had the highest disease incidence in a naturally infested field in 2005 and 2006. Incidence of CBR was moderate for Georgia-01R in both years, but was inconsistent for C34-24-85. Georgia-02C and Georganic also showed partial resistance to CBR in greenhouse tests. Inoculated plants in the field had similar reaction with Georgia-02C and Georganic showing higher CBR resistance than C-99R and DP-1 in both 2006 and 2007. The root rot severities for genotypes Georgia-02C and Georganic were lower than those for C-99R and DP-1. Incidence of CBR in the naturally infested field was significantly correlated with CBR incidence in the inoculated plants in the field (r = 0.84, P ≤ 0.01), but neither was correlated with disease ratings for greenhouse experiments. Peanut genotypes are most reliably screened by inoculating plants in the field or using uniformly infested fields. Further study is needed to improve greenhouse screening procedures.

show abstract

“…However, differences in plant condition rating associated with CBR were noted for cultivars (p 5 0.0038), with VA 98R expressing more disease than Perry (12% versus 5%, data not shown in tables). The cultivar VA 98R is more susceptible to CBR than the cultivar Perry (Dong et al, 2008;Isleib et al, 2003;Mozingo, 2000).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Planting Pattern on Pest Management in Virginia Market Type Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Twelve field trials were completed in North Carolina from 2005 to 2007 to determine the impact of planting pattern on peanut yield, market grade characteristics, and pest reaction for the Virginia market type cultivars Perry and VA 98R. The first set of experiments was designed to evaluate incidence of Cylindrocladium black rot (caused by Cylindrocladium parasiticum) using a factorial treatment arrangement of two cultivars, two levels of fumigation (none or metam sodium at 112 L/ha), and two levels of planting pattern (single rows spaced 91-cm apart or twin rows spaced 18 cm apart on 91-cm centers). Visible symptoms associated with Cylindrocladium black rot were not affected by planting pattern. However, in 1 of 3 trials pod scarring as a result of feeding by southern corn rootworm (Diabrotica undecimpunctata Howardi) was greater in twin rows compared with single rows. Damage from tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca) was also higher in the cultivar VA 98R planted in twin rows than in single rows or for the cultivar Perry. In the second set of experiments designed to evaluate incidence of Sclerotinia blight (caused by Sclerotinia minor), a factorial treatment arrangement consisting of two cultivars, two levels of boscalid (none or boscalid at 0.44 kg ai/ha), and two levels of planting pattern was implemented. Boscalid decreased Sclerotinia blight incidence at one of 4 locations, and increased pod yield. Yield of Perry was lower when grown in twin rows versus single rows, but yield of VA 98R was higher in twin rows. Peanut planted in twin rows yielded more than peanut planted in single rows regardless of cultivar, fumigation, or disease history in most trials. Results from these experiments suggest that planting pattern can have a minor impact on response to pests and that yield and market grades are often improved when peanut is planted in twin-row planting patterns compared with single rows.

show abstract

Registration of ‘Perry’ Peanut

Cited by 43 publications

References 10 publications

Agronomic Performance and Economic Return among Peanut Genotypes with Maximum and Minimum Production Inputs

Agronomic Performance and Economic Return among Peanut Genotypes with Maximum and Minimum Production Inputs

Evaluation of Resistance to Cylindrocladium Parasiticum of Runner-Type Peanut in The Greenhouse and Field

Influence of Planting Pattern on Pest Management in Virginia Market Type Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About