2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/8538215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of Partially Focused Images for 2D and 3D Reconstruction of Oversized Samples

Abstract: Methods of fracture surface 3D reconstruction from a series of partially focused images acquired in a small field of view (e.g., by confocal microscope or CCD camera) are well known. In this case, projection rays can be considered parallel and recorded images do not differ in any geometrical transformation from each other. In the case of larger samples (oversized for microscope or CCD camera), it is necessary to use a wider viewing field (e.g., standard cameras); taken images primarily differ in scaling but ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposed method Shape from Focus (SfF) recovers the 3D profile of the arbitrary surface from the set of partially focused images. The process starts with image registration based on cross correlation [20] where we detect the transformations (translation, rotation, scaling) between images.…”
Section: Methods Shape From Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposed method Shape from Focus (SfF) recovers the 3D profile of the arbitrary surface from the set of partially focused images. The process starts with image registration based on cross correlation [20] where we detect the transformations (translation, rotation, scaling) between images.…”
Section: Methods Shape From Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All processing and visualization of these data have been made by original author's software. For more information of these reconstructions and visualizations see [33] [34] [35] [36]. In this section, limestone surfaces in Figure 12 have been used for testing.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Jrc Index Of Real Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description of surface roughness depends on the development of various instrument technologies [ 35 ]. Current surface morphology detection technologies include the focused ion beam [ 36 ], X-ray computed tomography [ 37 ], scanning electron microscopy [ 38 , 39 , 40 ], and confocal microscopy [ 38 , 41 , 42 ]. Valikhani [ 43 ] evaluated the roughness of the substrate surface by using two non-contact test methods: terrestrial laser scanning and digital image processing and correlated the roughness with the bond strength between NC and UHPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%