2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2044250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of liver images to minimally invasive intraoperative surface and subsurface data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a separate extensive study looking at patterns of intraoperative model-to-OR-data fit, [11] also observed this behavior. Additionally, these phantom results are in accordance with our previous phantom studies which entailed multiple novel deformations as reported in [13] and a different liver phantom as in [28]. We acknowledge that the human-to-phantom validation framework could be further strengthened with additional phantom work (derived from varying clinically acquired anatomy), more deformations, and more clinical sparse surface data patterns; and while demonstrated in past work [13], [28], all of these areas are an important continued direction for the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In a separate extensive study looking at patterns of intraoperative model-to-OR-data fit, [11] also observed this behavior. Additionally, these phantom results are in accordance with our previous phantom studies which entailed multiple novel deformations as reported in [13] and a different liver phantom as in [28]. We acknowledge that the human-to-phantom validation framework could be further strengthened with additional phantom work (derived from varying clinically acquired anatomy), more deformations, and more clinical sparse surface data patterns; and while demonstrated in past work [13], [28], all of these areas are an important continued direction for the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, the influence of the sparsity and partiality of the target data is studied w. r. t. the accuracy of the registration method. Finally, different acquisition modalities are compared in Wu et al (2014).…”
Section: Geometry-based Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEM-based techniques that register the liver between pre-procedural and intra-procedural images have been investigated for image-guidance applications in radiation therapy [18][19][20] and minimally invasive liver surgery. 16,[21][22][23] A natural approach to FEM-based deformable liver registration is to use liver surface displacements as boundary conditions (BCs) from which the internal displacements are assumed based on the physical properties of the tissue. 14,24,25 However, if BCs are only applied on the volume's surface, FEM-based registration models may yield increased uncertainty at internal points of interest for cases of highly variable, heterogeneous, and localized deformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%