1988
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183x002800030042x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of Fourteen Cotton Germplasm Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The F 3 seeds from the individual F 2 plants were sent to Tecoman, Mexico, for seed increase. The resulting F 4 seeds were used for a field test with three replications in 2012 that contained 34 entries, including the 18 new glandless lines and other glandless germplasm lines released by other programs (Owen and Gannaway, 1995;Smith and Niles, 1988). From the 18 F 4 lines, a total of 77 selections were then made, and the F 5 seed sent to Tecoman, Mexico for generation advance to F 6 and seed increase to be used in four replicated tests (designated trials S, T, U, and V) each with 32 entries in 2013.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The F 3 seeds from the individual F 2 plants were sent to Tecoman, Mexico, for seed increase. The resulting F 4 seeds were used for a field test with three replications in 2012 that contained 34 entries, including the 18 new glandless lines and other glandless germplasm lines released by other programs (Owen and Gannaway, 1995;Smith and Niles, 1988). From the 18 F 4 lines, a total of 77 selections were then made, and the F 5 seed sent to Tecoman, Mexico for generation advance to F 6 and seed increase to be used in four replicated tests (designated trials S, T, U, and V) each with 32 entries in 2013.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive activities in glandless cotton breeding and research have been conducted since the 1960s, resulting in the release of many glandless cotton germplasms. There were intermittent breeding activities for glandless cotton until the late 1990s (Dobbs and Oakley, 2000;Owen and Gannaway, 1995;Shepherd, 1982;Smith and Niles, 1988), but the best existing high-yielding glandless germplasm still had a 10 to 35% yield gap compared to 'Acala 1517-08' and a 25 to 54% yield gap compared to current commercial transgenic cotton (Idowu et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014). Zhang et al (2014) further showed that selection within the existing glandless germplasm could improve yield, but an 11 to 18% yield gap still existed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, dehulled, roasted, and whole glandless kernel products and associated business did not gain much of the market, due to quality control, insects, and marketing issues, in addition to possible allergenic reactions (Hinze and Kohel, 2012). Since then, there were intermittent breeding activities until the late 1990s (Shepherd, 1982;Smith and Niles, 1988;Owen and Gannaway, 1995;Dobbs and Oakley, 2000). Using the glandless trait as a genetic marker, breeding populations using Upland cotton lines with varying gland densities involving glandless cotton were recently developed (Gutiérrez et al, 2006;Hinze et al, 2014).…”
Section: Breeding For Glandless Upland Cottonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TAM 96WD‐18 resulted from the cross of TAM 87G 3 –27, a breeding line with pedigree AET‐108/1209‐619‐2S‐77//PD 6992 developed in the Cotton Improvement Lab (Smith and Niles, 1994), and TAM 88G‐104, a high‐yielding picker‐type upland cotton with resistance to silverleaf whitefly [ Bemesis argentifolli (Perring and Bellows)] (Smith, 2001). TAM 88G‐104 was developed from the cross of ‘Deltapine 90’ (Calhoun et al, 1994) and CS‐8606 (Smith and Niles, 1988), and released as ‘Texas 418’. TAM 96WD‐18 was derived from a single F 2:3 plant selected on the basis of its apparent yield potential, fiber properties, and overall plant conformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%