Registration of ‘CP 00‐1101’ Sugarcane

Gilbert, Robert A.; Comstock, Jack C.; Glaz, B.; Edmé, Serge J.; Davidson, R. Wayne; Glynn, Neil C.; Miller, J. D.; Tai, P. Y. P.

doi:10.3198/jpr2007.12.0660crc

Cited by 42 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These include Louisiana sugarcane cultivar Ho 95-988 [18], HoCP 96-540 [19], Ho 00-950 [20], HoCP 91-552 [21], and Ho 00-961 [22]. In addition, molecular descriptors were also included in sugarcane cultivar registration articles from the Florida sugarcane breeding program, including CPCL 97-2730 [23], CP 00-1101 [24], CP 88-1165 [25], CP 00-1446 [26], and CP 00-2180 [27]. All the molecular descriptors of newly released Louisiana sugarcane cultivars are produced from SSR DNA marker-based genotyping that are stored in the local molecular identity database.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Databasing Molecular Identities of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Clones Constructed with Microsatellite (SSR) DNA Markers

Pan¹

2010

AJPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Databasing Molecular Identities of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Clones Constructed with Microsatellite (SSR) DNA Markers

Pan¹

2010

AJPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Average stalk population and cane and sucrose yields across clones were the highest in 2011 and lowest in 2013. CP 78-1628 (Tai et al, 1991), CP 89-2143 (Glaz et al, 2000), CP 00-1101 (Gilbert et al, 2008) were major check cultivars in the Stage II fields and each had 23 to 27 replicated plots in each experimental year. Although data of rust diseases in Stage II for this study were not analyzed, orange rust and brown rust ratings in the first clonal stage (Stage I, adjacent to Stage II) of the CP program in 2012 and 2013 were higher than those in the previous several years (Zhao et al, 2015a,b).…”

Section: Yield Traitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Sugarcane Yield Potential across Large Numbers of Genotypes using Canopy Reflectance Measurements

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Canopy reflectance indices have been used to monitor plant growth and estimate yields in many field crops. Little is known if canopy reflectance of sugarcane (a complex hybrid of Saccharum spp.) can be used to estimate growth and yield potential across large numbers of genotypes (clones) in the early stages of a breeding program. The objectives of this study were to identify clonal variation in sugarcane canopy reflectance and yield components and to determine if there were any putative relationships between canopy reflectance or reflectance indices and yield variables. In Stage II of the Canal Point sugarcane breeding and cultivar development program (CP program), canopy reflectance data were collected five to six times from each of 156 to 164 randomly selected clones during the growing seasons in 2011 through 2013 using a multispectral radiometer. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and other reflectance indices were calculated using the reflectance values. Yield traits, including stalk population, mean stalk weight, cane yield, commercial recoverable sucrose (CRS), and sucrose yield, were determined on mature plants in late October. Stalk population and cane yield were most highly correlated with reflectance at the wavebands centered at 800 and 980 nm and NDVI (r = 0.50–0.68; P < 0.0001), while CRS was not related to canopy reflectance. The best time to measure canopy reflectance for yield estimation across clones was from March to April (tillering stage). Canopy reflectance measurements at the early growth stage can be used as a screening tool to estimate yield potential for large numbers of clones in sugarcane breeding programs.

show abstract

“…The CP cultivars now account for more than 90% of the hectarage in Florida up from 14% in 1970. In 2012, the top six major sugarcane cultivars grown in Florida were 'CP 89-2143' (Glaz et al, 2000), 'CP 88-1762' (Tai et al, 1997), 'CP 00-1101' (Gilbert et al, 2008), 'CP 96-1252' (Edme and, 'CL 88-4730' (a cultivar of the United States Sugar Corporation) and 'CP 78-1628' (Tai et al, 1991) and their percent hectares were 20.7, 19.2, 10.2, 8.6, 7.4 and 7.3%, respectively (Rice et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Field Evaluation of Sugarcane Orange Rust for First Clonal Stage of the CP Cultivar Development Program

Zhao¹,

Davidson²,

Baltazar³

et al. 2015

American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consistent development of high-yielding sugarcane (a complex hybrid of Saccharum spp.) cultivars with resistance or tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses is critical to commercial sugarcane production. Currently, orange rust (caused by Puccinia kuehnii E.J. Butler) is a big challenge for the sugarcane production in Florida, USA. A better understanding of sugarcane genotypic variability in response to orange rust disease will help optimize breeding and selection strategies for disease resistance. Orange rust ratings, scaled from non-infection (0) to severe infection (4) with intervals of 0.5, were recorded from genotypes at the first clonal selection stage (Stage I) of the Canal Point sugarcane breeding and cultivar development program in Florida. Data were collected from all 14,272 and 12,661 genotypes and four replicated reference cultivars, CP 78-1628, CP 80-1743, CP 88-1762 and CP 89-2143, in July-August 2012 and 2013, respectively. Mean rust rating, % of rust infection and rust severity in each family (i.e., progeny of the cross from a female and male) and female parent and their Coefficients of Variation (CV) within and among families (females) were estimated. Results indicated that considerable variation exists in rust tolerance among families or females. The families or females for their progenies with the high susceptibility or resistance to orange rust were identified and ranked. The findings of this study are useful for evaluating sugarcane crosses and parents for rust disease and can help breeders use desirable parents for crossing and improve genotypic resistance to orange rust in the sugarcane breeding programs.

show abstract

Registration of ‘CP 00‐1101’ Sugarcane

Cited by 42 publications

References 18 publications

Databasing Molecular Identities of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Clones Constructed with Microsatellite (SSR) DNA Markers

Databasing Molecular Identities of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Clones Constructed with Microsatellite (SSR) DNA Markers

Assessment of Sugarcane Yield Potential across Large Numbers of Genotypes using Canopy Reflectance Measurements

Field Evaluation of Sugarcane Orange Rust for First Clonal Stage of the CP Cultivar Development Program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About