1989
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183x002900020057x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of ‘Bill Z’ Pinto Bean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher yield potential for pink and relatively recently bred red cultivars such as NW 63 (Burke, 1982b) and UI 239 (Myers et al, 1997) was also reported by Muñoz‐Perea et al (2006) in Idaho and has been a common observation in yield trials conducted elsewhere in the western USA. It is noteworthy that pink bean is prominent in the pedigree of Bill Z (Wood et al, 1989) and UI 239, the highest‐yielding cultivars, respectively, for the pinto and red market classes. Among pinto cultivars, Bill Z had the highest and UI 111, released in 1944, the lowest yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher yield potential for pink and relatively recently bred red cultivars such as NW 63 (Burke, 1982b) and UI 239 (Myers et al, 1997) was also reported by Muñoz‐Perea et al (2006) in Idaho and has been a common observation in yield trials conducted elsewhere in the western USA. It is noteworthy that pink bean is prominent in the pedigree of Bill Z (Wood et al, 1989) and UI 239, the highest‐yielding cultivars, respectively, for the pinto and red market classes. Among pinto cultivars, Bill Z had the highest and UI 111, released in 1944, the lowest yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, Common Red Mexican was used extensively as a source of adaptation to semiarid environments and resistance to Beet curly top virus (a leafhopper‐vectored geminivirus) in dry bean breeding programs in the western USA. For example, cultivars Othello (Burke, 1982), Bill Z (Wood et al, 1989), UI 239 (Myers et al, 1997), UI 259 (Myers et al, 2001b), and NW 63 (Burke et al, 1995) have Common Red Mexican in their parentage (Miklas, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further evaluated these tropical genotypes (SEC 10, SEN 3, SEN 20, SEN 21, SER 10, SER 22, and SER 26) (Table 1) in the current study with two great northern cultivars (Matterhorn [Kelly et al, 1999] and Beryl-R) and one pinto cultivar (Bill-Z) (Wood et al, 1989) serving as checks. Many of these genotypes were derived from crosses between Durango and Mesoamerican gene pools (S. Beebe, personal communication, 2005).…”
Section: Germplasmmentioning
confidence: 99%