2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration, atlas estimation and variability analysis of white matter fiber bundles modeled as currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather inter-individual differences (inter-subject variability) is an important topic of research as it may contain important information, for example for a certain cognitive experience or ability (Schlaug et al, 1995). In fact, relating inter-individual differences in brain structure to behavioral phenotype may represent a most powerful approach to inferring functional correlates of inter-personally variable anatomy (e.g., Durrleman et al, 2011;Thiebaut de Schotten et al, 2011). Following the notion that inter-subject variability may be a key component of understanding brain organization, most current brain atlases are probabilistic by their very nature (e.g., Forkert et al, 2012;Mazziotta et al, 2001;Roland and Zilles, 1994;Sun et al, 2012) and hence reflect this important aspect of brain organization.…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Variability Of Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rather inter-individual differences (inter-subject variability) is an important topic of research as it may contain important information, for example for a certain cognitive experience or ability (Schlaug et al, 1995). In fact, relating inter-individual differences in brain structure to behavioral phenotype may represent a most powerful approach to inferring functional correlates of inter-personally variable anatomy (e.g., Durrleman et al, 2011;Thiebaut de Schotten et al, 2011). Following the notion that inter-subject variability may be a key component of understanding brain organization, most current brain atlases are probabilistic by their very nature (e.g., Forkert et al, 2012;Mazziotta et al, 2001;Roland and Zilles, 1994;Sun et al, 2012) and hence reflect this important aspect of brain organization.…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Variability Of Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the construction of white matter atlases based (primarily) on diffusion-weighted imaging (e.g., Durrleman et al, 2011;Oishi et al, 2008;Prasad et al, 2014;Thiebaut de Schotten et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2010), their integration with those representing gray matter features or cross-species comparisons (Dougherty et al, 2005;Jbabdi et al, 2013;Javad et al, 2014;Sallet et al, 2013;Thiebaut de Schotten et al, 2012;Yendiki et al, 2011) will not be in the focus of the present work. We hope that this constraint will allow us to provide a more coherent overview on the state of the field, the challenges towards a true multi-modal brain atlas and potential solutions to overcome these.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we propose a novel dissimilarity measure which considers both the pathway and the anatomical locations of the termini of the fibers. It can be seen as an extension of the framework of currents [3] and we have called it: weighted currents. As usual currents, it does not need point-to-point correspondence between fibers, it has a closed form and easy to compute expression and it can be used to compare fiber bundles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present state-of-the-art, the concept of geodesic shape averaging allows unbiased constructions of atlases through diffeomorphic methods [12,2,17], i.e., the transformation of a reference shape toward an average (the geometry of the atlas) follows a geodesic path on a Riemannian manifold (the space of diffeomorphic transformations). While the LDDMM [4,3,6] or forward scheme approaches [1,8] provide elegant mathematical frameworks for averaging shapes, these methods could be slow and find their limitations with high shape variability. Guimond et al [10] proposed a fast and efficient algorithm [19,16,26] with sequential (pairwise) registrations to a reference image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%