2007
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2007.4353814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration Algorithm for Statistical Bone Shape Reconstruction from Radiographs - An Accuracy Study

Abstract: Medical diagnoses relying on 3D data has become a procedure in clinical practice, increasing the valuable diagnostic information. However, high costs are associated with common 3D imaging modalities and therefore posing the demand for alternative approaches. Correspondingly, 2D-3D registration in terms of deforming a surface model of the anatomy of interest under the constraint of statistical plausibility has become an active field of research. In this context a quantitative analysis of the accuracy of the res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods align a 3D bone model, segmented from CT or MRI, with calibrated fluoroscopic sequences. Alignment is achieved by minimizing either an image intensity distance through calculation of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) (Anderst et al, 2009; Bey et al, 2008; Dennis et al, 2005; Mahfouz et al, 2003; Muhit et al, 2010; Nakajima et al, 2007; Pickering et al, 2009; Scott and Barney Smith, 2006; You et al, 2001), or an image edge to bone model silhouette distance (Defrate et al, 2006; Fregly et al, 2005; Gollmer et al, 2007; Hanson et al, 2006; Hirokawa et al, 2008; Kitagawa et al, 2010; Li et al, 2008; Tersi et al, 2012; Torry et al, 2011; Tsai et al, 2010). Kinematic analysis not requiring the subject-specific 3D model would, however, be preferred, as it would lower analysis costs and eliminate the prior 3D acquisition resulting in lower radiation dose in the case of CT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods align a 3D bone model, segmented from CT or MRI, with calibrated fluoroscopic sequences. Alignment is achieved by minimizing either an image intensity distance through calculation of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) (Anderst et al, 2009; Bey et al, 2008; Dennis et al, 2005; Mahfouz et al, 2003; Muhit et al, 2010; Nakajima et al, 2007; Pickering et al, 2009; Scott and Barney Smith, 2006; You et al, 2001), or an image edge to bone model silhouette distance (Defrate et al, 2006; Fregly et al, 2005; Gollmer et al, 2007; Hanson et al, 2006; Hirokawa et al, 2008; Kitagawa et al, 2010; Li et al, 2008; Tersi et al, 2012; Torry et al, 2011; Tsai et al, 2010). Kinematic analysis not requiring the subject-specific 3D model would, however, be preferred, as it would lower analysis costs and eliminate the prior 3D acquisition resulting in lower radiation dose in the case of CT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%