1997
DOI: 10.1007/s003300050115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registered image subtraction for CT-, MR- and coronary angiography

Abstract: Conventional post-processing of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) by 3D spiral CT, 3D MRI and 2D DSA is often hampered by extended artefacts due to patient movements during examination. In this paper an image registration procedure prior to the digital subtraction is introduced allowing an enhanced visualization of the contrast agent. The object displacement is detected by analysis of image deformations in small local regions. The motion pattern is used to compute a new synthetic mask of maximum congruence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8,[14][15][16][17][18][19] Drawbacks of these methods are the complexity of use, dependence on the user, or high dose of radiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,[14][15][16][17][18][19] Drawbacks of these methods are the complexity of use, dependence on the user, or high dose of radiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we recommend using bone subtraction to depict and present vascular pathology but suggest that morphologic measurements should always be performed on the original CTA data. An approach that could overcome this problem has been described by Beier er al, 22 who introduced an elastic warping method for (2D) image registration on a section-bysection basis to separate vessels from surrounding bone. Runtime was a major drawback, ranging from 1 to 2 hours per dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image processing procedure like digital subtraction angiography (DSA), a technique to eliminate unwanted and confusing shadows, has become widely applied as a visual aid in imaging diagnosis [2]. The image obtained by digitally subtracting an unenhanced image from a contrastenhanced image reflects the distribution of the contrast agent [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%