ContextConventional life cycle assessment (LCA) has been increasingly criticized for lacking spatial information, especially for agricultural systems where high spatial sensitivity is present.
ObjectivesThe objective of this research is twofold: rst, to assess the potential environmental impacts and the production e ciency of pastoralism farming, and, second, to identify the in uence of the spatial distribution of farms on the environmental impacts, if any.
MethodsA cradle-to-gate spatialized agricultural LCA was conducted for 45 farms surveyed from the Hulunbuir Grassland by splitting direct onsite processes from upstream processes, adopting the spatialized characterization factors (SCFs) of IMPACT World+.
ResultsContrasting results were observed for different impact categories regarding whether upstream or onsite processes served as the environmental hotspot. While direct onsite animal emissions did not show spatial dependence at the inventory stage, its resulting impact scores demonstrated the most contrasting spatial patterns among various impact categories, depending on whether and how spatial resolution and location were introduced during the LCIA stage.
ConclusionsA cradle-to-gate spatialized agricultural LCA was proposed and applied to assess the environmental impacts of pastoralism farming in Hulunbuir Grassland. The overall spatial dependence of the LCA results was weak, if present, it depended on the interactions between spatial variation within the life cycle inventory and the spatial resolution and location of the SCFs. Environmental burden shifting occurred between different impact categories, and it remains a policy challenge as how to increase the production e ciency in the pastoralism system.