Regional variations in ambulatory care and incidence of cardiovascular events

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Variations in the prevalence of traditional cardiac risk factors only partially account for geographic variations in the incidence of cardiovascular disease. We examined the extent to which preventive ambulatory health care services contribute to geographic variations in cardiovascular event rates. METHODS:We conducted a cohort study involving 5.5 million patients aged 40 to 79 years in Ontario, Canada, with no hospital stays for cardiovascular disease as of January 2008, through linkage of multiple population-based health databases. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a major cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascularrelated death) over the following 5 years. We compared patient demographics, cardiac risk factors and ambulatory health care services across the province's 14 health service regions, known as Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs), and evaluated the contribution of these variables to regional variations in cardiovascular event rates.RESULTS: Cardiovascular event rates across LHINs varied from 3.2 to 5.7 events per 1000 person-years. Compared with residents of high-rate LHINs, those of lowrate health regions received physician services more often (e.g., 4.2 v. 3.5 mean annual family physician visits, p value for LHIN-level trend = 0.01) and were screened for risk factors more often. Lowrate LHINs were also more likely to achieve treatment targets for hypercholesterolemia (51.8% v. 49.6% of patients, p = 0.03) and controlled hypertension (67.4% v. 53.3%, p = 0.04). Differences in patient and health system factors accounted for 74.5% of the variation in events between LHINs, of which 15.5% was attributable to health system factors alone. INTERPRETATION:Preventive ambulatory health care services were provided more frequently in health regions with lower cardiovascular event rates. Health system interventions to improve equitable access to preventive care might improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: 2018 update

“…Use of the set of quality indicators developed by the CANHEART initiative (based on previous versions of the C-CHANGE guideline) has shown that health regions in Ontario with better adherence to these guidelines have fewer cardiovascular events. 92,93 The Triple Aim Framework offers a foundation for health care providers to conceptualize health care with an emphasis on optimizing health for individuals and populations, and the health care experience. 94 This framework considers the patient experience of care, health of populations and per capita cost of health care, all of which need to be considered simultaneously.…”

Making It Happen: Middle Managers' Roles in Innovation Implementation in Health Care

“…In cancer, for example, the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control estimated that cancer outcomes in Canada could improve by as much as 30% by appropriately and routinely applying existing scientific evidence in practice (Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control, ). Ultimately, the poor uptake of evidence means that many patients do not benefit from optimal care (Curtis, Walker, & Goldacre, ; Kryworuchko, Stacey, Bai, & Graham, ; Sheldon et al., ; Tu et al., ).…”

Canadians’ views on the use of routinely collected data in health research: a patient-oriented cross-sectional survey

“…early childhood development, and link them with other health data including electronic medical records 8 and cancer and perinatal registries. For example, by linking 17 sources of data, Ontario researchers assessed regional variation in cardiovascular event rates 9 and the added value of highintensity statin therapy for older patients. 10 A crucial advantage of these "real-world" data is their coverage of Canadians of all ages and ethnicities.…”