THE CONCEPT OF VASCULAR REMODELING was first mentioned in the late 1950s by Theodore Gillman (6, 7), who described variation in uterine artery remodeling among women of different ethnicities and ages. Early pioneering work by Baumbach and Heistad (2) further documented vascular remodeling and alterations in stiffness in cerebral resistance arterioles of hypertensive rats, providing seminal evidence that remodeling may be associated with altered vascular biomechanics. Their group described vascular remodeling as inward or outward and eutrophic, hypertrophic, or hypotrophic, depending on the amount of material comprising the vessel wall-a premise that provided the foundational definition of pathological vascular remodeling and mechanics that is still used today (10).The clinical implications of alterations in vessel size and mechanical stiffness are reflected in key studies that have demonstrated vascular stiffness-particularly increased carotidfemoral pulse wave velocity-as an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, and alterations in vascular stiffness appear to be particularly accelerated in obese, diabetic, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) populations (9,13,16). A more recent study reported that local stiffness of the carotid and femoral artery, but not the brachial artery, is also associated with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality (15), suggesting that arterial stiffness does not change uniformly across all vascular beds. Though under assessed experimentally, it is tempting to speculate that local alterations in arterial stiffness would predict localized vascular complications in a disease-specific manner. If so, estimates of coronary circulation stiffness would be especially important for predicting cardiovascular events. Unfortunately, there are no methods that directly measure arterial, including coronary, stiffness in vivo, and indirect measures (pulse wave velocity) are influenced by a variety of hemodynamic factors that are difficult to control (13).In the American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Bender and colleagues (3) explored whether alterations in the femoral artery might predict changes in the coronary artery. In a mouse model of Western diet-induced obesity, they demonstrated blood pressure-independent femoral artery endothelial dysfunction and stiffening in the absence of coronary artery endothelial dysfunction or stiffening. These results indicate that deleterious alterations in the femoral artery may not be predictive of coronary artery dysfunction or stiffness, at least in this mouse model of obesity. Their results further suggest that artery stiffening is not uniform but instead varies from tissue to tissue. This notion is also supported by our previous work with the type 2 diabetic db/db mouse model (8). Relative to control mice, diabetic mice exhibited increased stiffness in the aorta and femoral artery but decreased stiffness in the coronary microcirculation. We also demonstrated that stiffness was reduced in coronary resis...