2011
DOI: 10.1785/0120100225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Spectral Analysis of Three Moderate Earthquakes in Northeastern North America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Q model used in the plot, as determined by the average event-based attenuation in the frequency range from 0.32 to 16 Hz, at distances from 150-500 km (as described in Atkinson and Boore, 2014), is given by Q 416f 0:43 . This event-based Q model is within the range of typical regional Q models, such as those of Atkinson (2004) and Boatwright and Seekins (2011). In particular, it is very similar to the average Q relationship for southern Ontario and western Quebec, Q ∼ 500f 0:5 , as reported by Mereu et al (2013).…”
Section: Attenuation and Source Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The Q model used in the plot, as determined by the average event-based attenuation in the frequency range from 0.32 to 16 Hz, at distances from 150-500 km (as described in Atkinson and Boore, 2014), is given by Q 416f 0:43 . This event-based Q model is within the range of typical regional Q models, such as those of Atkinson (2004) and Boatwright and Seekins (2011). In particular, it is very similar to the average Q relationship for southern Ontario and western Quebec, Q ∼ 500f 0:5 , as reported by Mereu et al (2013).…”
Section: Attenuation and Source Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Given that there are no data within 10 km, this result may seem paradoxical, but it is easily explained. The two attenuation models only differ inside of 10 km (with geometrical spreading of 1/R 1.3 and 1/R Boore et al (2010), minus stations S05 and S14; add NCEER = add site class A NCEER data from Boatwright and Seekins (2011); xBS11= remove Bea10' data classified as site class other than A by BS11; BS11 params = the inversion for ∆σ used BS11 parameters for source velocity, radiation pattern, and site class A amplifications. σ RSDL = the standard deviation of the residuals between observed and simulated logPSA (base 10 logarithms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the hypocentral distance becomes large, the surface waves become more dominant, and geometrical spreading is ideally 1= R p . Though this crossover distance (the point at which the geometrical spreading deviates from 1=R) is suggested to be about 50 km for crustal earthquakes (Boatwright and Seekins, 2011), we consider 1=R as the geometrical spreading out to 150 km, the full range of our data. Because tectonic tremor occurs deeper than crustal earthquakes, the crossover distance should be larger.…”
Section: Method: Simultaneous Estimation For Attenuation Parameter Anmentioning
confidence: 99%